These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11964324)

  • 21. Mothers who use nurse midwives have shorter hospital stays and fewer cesarean sections and episiotomies.
    J Nurs Adm; 1993; 23(7-8):11, 40. PubMed ID: 8360755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Women in the crossfire: forced repeat cesareans.
    Jukelevics N
    Birth; 2002 Jun; 29(2):149-50. PubMed ID: 12000419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Analysis of maternal morbidity and mortality in Slovak Republic in the years 2007-2012].
    Korbeľ M; Krištúfková A; Dugátová M; Daniš J; Némethová B; Kaščák P; Nižňanská Z
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 28252305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cesarean births: reducing incidence while improving outcomes.
    Radabaugh S; Everhart A
    AWHONN Lifelines; 1999; 3(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10362917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Florida ranks 2nd nationally for C-sections.
    Gilkey L
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2009-2010 Winter; (92):6. PubMed ID: 20092133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery.
    Miesnik SR; Reale BJ
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2007; 36(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 17973706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Episiotomy, hospital birth and cesarean section: technology gone haywire--what is the sutured tear rate at first births supposed to be?
    Cohain JS
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (85):24-5. PubMed ID: 18429515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surrogate markers of healthcare standards.
    Murphy JF
    Ir Med J; 2007 Jan; 100(1):324. PubMed ID: 17380918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The vanishing mother: Cesarean section and "evidence-based obstetrics".
    Wendland CL
    Med Anthropol Q; 2007 Jun; 21(2):218-33. PubMed ID: 17601085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differences in obstetrical care and outcomes associated with the proportion of the obstetrician's shift completed.
    Yee LM; McGee P; Bailit JL; Wapner RJ; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Tita ATN; Saade GR; Sorokin Y; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):430.e1-430.e11. PubMed ID: 33812810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unnecessary cesarean delivery in Louisiana: an analysis of birth certificate data.
    Kabir AA; Steinmann WC; Myers L; Khan MM; Herrera EA; Yu S; Jooma N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):10-9; discussion 3A. PubMed ID: 14749628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strategic measures to reduce the caesarean section rate in Brazil.
    Occhi GM; de Lamare Franco Netto T; Neri MA; Rodrigues EAB; de Lourdes Vieira Fernandes A
    Lancet; 2018 Oct; 392(10155):1290-1291. PubMed ID: 30322565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Have caesarean section rates become an obsolete statistic? Time to throw in the towel in the fight to reduce caesarean section rates.
    Oláh K
    BJOG; 2019 Jun; 126(7):828-830. PubMed ID: 30739393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request": was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise?
    Young D
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 16948716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Birth Outcomes for Midwifery Clients Who Begin Postdates Induction of Labour Under Midwifery Care Compared With Those Who Are Transferred to Obstetrical Care.
    Elderhorst E; Ahmed RJ; Hutton EK; Darling EK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1444-1452. PubMed ID: 30712906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maternal morbidity and mortality in Slovak Republic in the years 2007-2015.
    Korbeľ M; Krištúfková A; Daniš J; Némethová B; Kaščák P; Nižňanská Z
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(2):129-139. PubMed ID: 31238683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
    Degani N; Sikich N
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(9):1-58. PubMed ID: 26366243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care for low-risk pregnancies: A cost comparison.
    Attanasio LB; Alarid-Escudero F; Kozhimannil KB
    Birth; 2020 Mar; 47(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 31680337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The top 10 reasons elective cesarean section should be on decline.
    Williams DR
    AWHONN Lifelines; 2005; 9(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 15786781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prevention of the first cesarean delivery.
    Spong CY
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2015 Jun; 42(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 26002173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.