185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11964449)
21. Scientific misconduct. Japan's universities take action.
Normile D
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):26. PubMed ID: 17204614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Misconduct in biomedical research].
Kerkhof PL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Sep; 137(36):1843. PubMed ID: 8377866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research misconduct. China science foundation takes action against 60 grantees.
Yidong G
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5742):1798-9. PubMed ID: 16166484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. More questions about research misconduct.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5578):13. PubMed ID: 12098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [A few words concerning the editorial note about the confirmation of plagiarism with regard to eight published articles by Dr. Andrzej Jendryczko].
WroĊski M
Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(5-6):306-9. PubMed ID: 9867694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Research ethics. China's science ministry fires a barrage of measures at misconduct.
Yidong G; Xin H
Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5781):1728-9. PubMed ID: 16794046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Research integrity. U.S. universities urged to do a better job.
Kaiser J
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5580):321. PubMed ID: 12130761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Professional ethics: an overview from health research ethics point of view.
Nyika A
Acta Trop; 2009 Nov; 112 Suppl 1():S84-90. PubMed ID: 19665439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientific misconduct: from salami slicing to data fabrication.
Mojon-Azzi SM; Mojon DS
Ophthalmic Res; 2004; 36(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15007234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it?
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Plagiarism.
Manogue M; Rohlin M; Baum B; Winning T;
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Nov; 13(4):189. PubMed ID: 19824953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Focus on quality, not just quantity.
Peng C
Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7356):267. PubMed ID: 21776039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Self-plagiarism: oxymoron, fair use, or scientific misconduct?
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2004; 52(6):273-4. PubMed ID: 15614263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Plagiarism, or scientific fraud, is not new subject at all.
Saidi F
Arch Iran Med; 2009 May; 12(3):335; author reply 335. PubMed ID: 19623753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Good manners.
Koehn RK
Nature; 1995 Nov; 378(6552):10. PubMed ID: 7477273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Plagiarism and misconduct in scientific publishing.
Jones DS
J Pharm Pharmacol; 2009 May; 61(5):539. PubMed ID: 19405991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Misconduct: China needs university ethics courses.
Wang Q
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7099):132. PubMed ID: 16837997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethics opinion: conflicts of interest in presentations and publications and dietetics research.
Woteki CE
J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Jan; 106(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16390663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Research integrity and misconduct: first-hand experiences of plagiarism and data manufacture.
Louw Q; Grimmer-Somers K; Bialocerkowski A
Physiother Res Int; 2011 Jun; 16(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 21594956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
