These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1196585)

  • 1. Channel selection and the suffix effect.
    Morton J; Chambers SM
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1975 Aug; 27(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 1196585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alternative interpretation of the stimulus suffix effect.
    Parkinson SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Jul; 4(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 670906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
    Huang ST; Glenberg AM
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects.
    Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and magnitude of auditory laterality effects: the influence of attention.
    Voyer D; Flight JI
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):397-413. PubMed ID: 11487289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Status of spatial location in auditory sensory memory: evidence from rapidly presented lists.
    Odgers RP; Colle HA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Sep; 6(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 7430969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual processing in dichotic listening.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 May; 2(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 1225941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.
    Jones MR
    Psychol Rev; 1976 Sep; 83(5):323-55. PubMed ID: 794904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shifting attention between the ears.
    Treisman AM
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 23(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 5559704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The suffix effect: how many positions are involved?
    Engle RW
    Mem Cognit; 1980 May; 8(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 7392951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.
    Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Clark-Foos A; Hicks JL
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 20408041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect.
    Crowder RG
    Psychol Rev; 1978 Nov; 85(6):502-24. PubMed ID: 734019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word recall as a function of bisensory and unisensory split-span task presentation and modality preferences.
    Smith CK; Everett FL; Westendorf DH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 724392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction.
    Sörqvist P; Marsh JE; Jahncke H
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Nov; 74(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 20688422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recency and suffix effects in pictures as a function of recall method.
    Manning SK; Schreier H
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 3364617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of affective ratings in intentional and incidental learning.
    Eagle MN; Mulliken S
    Am J Psychol; 1974 Sep; 87(3):409-23. PubMed ID: 4455096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lack of memory for nonattended items in dichotic listening.
    Wickens DD; Moody M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Nov; 2(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 1010994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.