BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11966587)

  • 1. Direct B-mode NASCET-style stenosis measurement and Doppler ultrasound as parameters for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Rotstein AH; Gibson RN; King PM
    Australas Radiol; 2002 Mar; 46(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 11966587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. B-mode ultrasound measurement of carotid bifurcation stenoses: is it reliable?
    MacKenzie KS; French-Sherry E; Burns K; Pooley T; Bassiouny HS
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2002; 36(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 11951099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography.
    Shaalan WE; Wahlgren CM; Desai T; Piano G; Skelly C; Bassiouny HS
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jul; 48(1):104-12; discussion 112-3. PubMed ID: 18486416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic NASCET index: a new doppler parameter for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Hathout GM; Fink JR; El-Saden SM; Grant EG
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 Jan; 26(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15661704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carotid stenosis measurement on colour Doppler ultrasound: agreement of ECST, NASCET and CCA methods applied to ultrasound with intra-arterial angiographic stenosis measurement.
    Wardlaw JM; Lewis S
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Nov; 56(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15964165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suitable methods of measuring acceleration time in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Iizuka K; Takekawa H; Iwasaki A; Igarashi H; Suzuki K; Kobayashi S; Tsukui D; Hirata K
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Apr; 47(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 31912319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning.
    Moneta GL; Edwards JM; Chitwood RW; Taylor LM; Lee RW; Cummings CA; Porter JM
    J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 17(1):152-7; discussion 157-9. PubMed ID: 8421332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study.
    Chen JC; Salvian AJ; Taylor DC; Teal PA; Marotta TR; Hsiang YN
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 9588510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) Carotid Doppler Velocity Criteria for Grading North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.
    Polak JF; Alexandrov AV
    J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jul; 42(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 36527708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simplified ultrasound protocol for the exclusion of clinically significant carotid artery stenosis.
    Högberg D; Dellagrammaticas D; Kragsterman B; Björck M; Wanhainen A
    Ups J Med Sci; 2016 Aug; 121(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 27379448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria.
    Stanziale SF; Wholey MH; Boules TN; Selzer F; Makaroun MS
    J Endovasc Ther; 2005 Jun; 12(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 15943510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Three-dimensional DSA imaging and 3-dimensional measurement of cross section for internal carotid artery stenosis].
    Iwai R; Tsumura K; Kuwayama N; Hirashima Y; Endo S
    No To Shinkei; 2003 Aug; 55(8):661-7. PubMed ID: 13677299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex with digital subtraction angiography.
    Padayachee TS; Cox TC; Modaresi KB; Colchester AC; Taylor PR
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1997 Feb; 13(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 9091152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.
    Carpenter JP; Lexa FJ; Davis JT
    Stroke; 1996 Apr; 27(4):695-9. PubMed ID: 8614933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of carotid stenosis using duplex ultrasonography with a microconvex array transducer: a validation with cerebral angiography.
    Tateishi Y; Tsujino A; Hamabe J; Tasaki O; Morikawa M; Horie N; Hayashi K; Nagata I
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013 Nov; 22(8):e360-5. PubMed ID: 23608369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis assessment method on indicating carotid surgery.
    Müller M; Bartylla K; Rolshausen A; Piepgras U; Schimrigk K
    Vasa; 1998 Feb; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9540429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of acceleration time ratio in diagnosis of internal carotid artery origin stenosis.
    Nishihira T; Takekawa H; Suzuki K; Suzuki A; Tsukahara Y; Iizuka K; Igarashi H; Iwasaki A; Okamura M; Hirata K
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jul; 45(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 29388010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The measurement of stenosis of the internal carotid artery: comparison of doppler ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography and the 3D CT volume rendering technique.
    Flis V; Tetickovic E; Breznik S; Stirn B; Matela J; Miksić K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2004; 116 Suppl 2():51-5. PubMed ID: 15506311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of ultrasound measurements of carotid stenosis compared to MRA and DSA.
    Honish C; Sadanand V; Fladeland D; Chow V; Pirouzmand F
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2005 Nov; 32(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16408576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.