These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11967410)

  • 81. [Strengthening causal inference in studies using non-experimental data: an application of propensity score and instrumental variable methods].
    Kim MH; Do YK
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2007 Nov; 40(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 18063905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Understanding policy amenable risk factors: Alcohol consumption and long-term care use among people over 65 years old.
    Malisauskaite G; Nizalova O; Gousia K; Teo H; Forder J
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Apr; 347():116746. PubMed ID: 38471406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Developing non-response weights to account for attrition-related bias in a longitudinal pregnancy cohort.
    Pitt TM; Hetherington E; Adhikari K; Premji S; Racine N; Tough SC; McDonald S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):295. PubMed ID: 38097944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. How does a local instrumental variable method perform across settings with instruments of differing strengths? A simulation study and an evaluation of emergency surgery.
    Moler-Zapata S; Grieve R; Basu A; O'Neill S
    Health Econ; 2023 Sep; 32(9):2113-2126. PubMed ID: 37303265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Sensitivity analyses informed by tests for bias in observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):475-487. PubMed ID: 34505285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Bias amplification in the g-computation algorithm for time-varying treatments: a case study of industry payments and prescription of opioid products.
    Inoue K; Goto A; Kondo N; Shinozaki T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):120. PubMed ID: 35468735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Addressing unmeasured confounders in cohort studies: Instrumental variable method for a time-fixed exposure on an outcome trajectory.
    Le Bourdonnec K; Samieri C; Tzourio C; Mura T; Mishra A; Trégouët DA; Proust-Lima C
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200358. PubMed ID: 38098309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies.
    Parast L; Griffin BA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):161-182. PubMed ID: 26880366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. The control outcome calibration approach for causal inference with unobserved confounding.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 24363326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. How to compare instrumental variable and conventional regression analyses using negative controls and bias plots.
    Davies NM; Thomas KH; Taylor AE; Taylor GMJ; Martin RM; Munafò MR; Windmeijer F
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):2067-2077. PubMed ID: 28398582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Effect of general health checks on the treatment of chronic diseases: accounting for self-selection in the retrospective cohort study using Korea National Health Insurance data.
    Yoon S; Jun DB; Park S
    BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e064425. PubMed ID: 36921945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.
    Myers JA; Rassen JA; Gagne JJ; Huybrechts KF; Schneeweiss S; Rothman KJ; Joffe MM; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 174(11):1213-22. PubMed ID: 22025356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Pre-processing data to reduce biases: full matching incorporating an instrumental variable in population-based studies.
    Cerna-Turoff I; Maurer K; Baiocchi M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1920-1930. PubMed ID: 35560220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. A causal proportional hazards estimator under homogeneous or heterogeneous selection in an IV setting.
    Sørensen DN; Martinussen T; Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Oct; 25(4):639-659. PubMed ID: 31065968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. All in the Family: Mental Health Spillover Effects between Working Spouses.
    Fletcher J
    B E J Econom Anal Policy; 2009 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 20098633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Causal inference for observational longitudinal studies using deep survival models.
    Zhu J; Gallego B
    J Biomed Inform; 2022 Jul; 131():104119. PubMed ID: 35714819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Sensitivity analysis of G-estimators to invalid instrumental variables.
    Vancak V; Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(23):4257-4281. PubMed ID: 37497859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Combating unmeasured confounding in cross-sectional studies: evaluating instrumental-variable and Heckman selection models.
    DeMaris A
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):380-97. PubMed ID: 25110904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Can we make smart choices between OLS and contaminated IV methods?
    Basu A; Chan KC
    Health Econ; 2014 Apr; 23(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 23765683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Semiparametric Estimation with Data Missing Not at Random Using an Instrumental Variable.
    Sun B; Liu L; Miao W; Wirth K; Robins J; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Stat Sin; 2018 Oct; 28(4):1965-1983. PubMed ID: 33335381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.