272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11968147)
1. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two canal lubricants in removing smear layer.
Tam A; Yu DC
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Nov; 21(11):967-72; quiz 974. PubMed ID: 11968147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal.
George R; Meyers IA; Walsh LJ
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1524-7. PubMed ID: 19026887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation.
Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP
J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removal of intracanal smear layer by doxycycline: SEM analysis.
Santos Felippe MC; Vitor C; Cristina S; Tadeu W
Aust Endod J; 2010 Aug; 36(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 20666751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of chlorhexidine gel and liquid associated with sodium hypochlorite cleaning on the root canal walls.
Valera MC; Chung A; Menezes MM; Fernandes CE; Carvalho CA; Camargo SE; Camargo CH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):e82-7. PubMed ID: 20692188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Root Canal Tapering on Smear Layer Removal.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Afkhami F; Tanbakuchi B; Zadeh MM; Mohammadi MM
N Y State Dent J; 2016 Apr; 82(3):35-8. PubMed ID: 27348950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S
J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls.
Sen BH; Ertürk O; Pişkin B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 19699113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Arvaniti IS; Khabbaz MG
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):871-4. PubMed ID: 21787508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness?
Gu XH; Mao CY; Liang C; Wang HM; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Oct; 117(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 19758258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
