BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11968147)

  • 21. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of F-File on removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Tunga U; Parlak E; Bodrumlu E; Aydemir H; Yeşilsoy C
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 21771185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer.
    Chopra S; Murray PE; Namerow KN
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1243-5. PubMed ID: 18793930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal.
    Wu L; Mu Y; Deng X; Zhang S; Zhou D
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 22341079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant.
    Grandini S; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 12043868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
    Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.
    Lui JN; Kuah HG; Chen NN
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 17368342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
    Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
    Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA.
    O'Connell MS; Morgan LA; Beeler WJ; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 2000 Dec; 26(12):739-43. PubMed ID: 11471645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures.
    Calt S; Serper A
    J Endod; 2002 Jan; 28(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11806642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of Glyde File Prep in smear layer removal.
    Lim TS; Wee TY; Choi MY; Koh WC; Sae-Lim V
    Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 12752647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration.
    Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Goel S; Tewari S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 19576804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) creates hybrid layers in radicular dentin only when EDTA is used as the final rinse.
    Pinna L; Loushine RJ; Bishop FD; Cotti E; Weller RN; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 20225474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of light penetration and smear layer removal on adhesion of post-cores to root canal dentin by self-etching adhesives.
    Wu H; Hayashi M; Okamura K; Koytchev EV; Imazato S; Tanaka S; Tanaka Y; Sano H; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1484-92. PubMed ID: 19700189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of ultrasonically activated irrigation on reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in experimentally infected root canals.
    Harrison AJ; Chivatxaranukul P; Parashos P; Messer HH
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):968-77. PubMed ID: 20726913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ultrastructural evaluation of radicular dentin after Nd:YAG laser irradiation combined with different chemical substances.
    Faria MI; Souza-Gabriel AE; Marchesan MA; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva-Sousa YT
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 19014023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of different root canal irrigating solutions.
    de la Casa ML; Raiden G
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16673793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.