These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11971632)

  • 1. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion.
    Navon D; Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 May; 44(3):193-251. PubMed ID: 11971632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm.
    Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):610-26. PubMed ID: 17563225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):790-802. PubMed ID: 16131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor limitation in dual-task processing under ballistic movement conditions.
    Ulrich R; Fernández SR; Jentzsch I; Rolke B; Schröter H; Leuthold H
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):788-93. PubMed ID: 16984296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for the selective attention mechanism and dual-task interference.
    Liu CC; Doong JL; Hsu CC; Huang WS; Jeng MC
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 19166992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
    Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confirming and disconfirming theories about ideomotor compatibility in dual-task performance: a reply to Greenwald (2005).
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):226-9. PubMed ID: 15709876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How strategic is the central bottleneck: can it be overcome by trying harder?
    Ruthruff E; Johnston JC; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1368-84. PubMed ID: 19803643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Sep; 57(2):75-121. PubMed ID: 18262510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task switching: a PDP model.
    Gilbert SJ; Shallice T
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 May; 44(3):297-337. PubMed ID: 11971634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The capacity constraint in the prefrontal and parietal regions for coordinating dual arithmetic tasks.
    Kuo BC; Yeh YY; Chen DY; Liang KC; Chen JH
    Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 1199():100-10. PubMed ID: 18291350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set.
    Oriet C; Jolcoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1036-49. PubMed ID: 14585021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E; Remington RW
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Jun; 52(4):291-345. PubMed ID: 16581054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An information-processing model of three cortical regions: evidence in episodic memory retrieval.
    Sohn MH; Goode A; Stenger VA; Jung KJ; Carter CS; Anderson JR
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 15734340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time pressure effects on information processing in overlapping tasks: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.
    Sangals J; Ross L; Sommer W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Nov; 117(3):275-94. PubMed ID: 15500807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractoriness of an extended movement .
    Williams LR
    J Mot Behav; 1974 Dec; 6(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 23961837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.