These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11972663)

  • 1. Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.
    Muncer S; Taylor S; Craigie M
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11972663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.
    Hempel S; Miles JN; Booth MJ; Wang Z; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2():107. PubMed ID: 24286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists.
    Lopez-Lee D
    Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):520-44. PubMed ID: 12243106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to: 'Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis' by S. Muncer (2002) Journal of Advanced Nursing 38, 274-280.
    Driver R
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Dec; 40(6):652-3. PubMed ID: 12473045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misleading meta-analysis.
    Egger M; Smith GD
    BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6982):752-4. PubMed ID: 7711568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):462-9. PubMed ID: 10481815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The case for failed meta-analyses.
    Naylor CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9238567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects.
    van Zundert CHJ; Miočević M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):849-865. PubMed ID: 32833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.
    Sterne JA; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):1046-55. PubMed ID: 11576817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
    Tang JL; Liu JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empowering research: statistical power in general practice research.
    Fox N; Mathers N
    Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 14(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 9283855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of research methodology used in clinical trials of magnesium and myocardial infarction--why does controversy persist despite ISIS-4?
    Woods KL
    Coron Artery Dis; 1996 May; 7(5):348-51. PubMed ID: 8866199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.
    Yusuf S; Flather M
    BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6982):751-2. PubMed ID: 7711567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of intravenous magnesium in acute myocardial infarction in reducing arrhythmias and mortality. Meta-analysis of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.
    Horner SM
    Circulation; 1992 Sep; 86(3):774-9. PubMed ID: 1387591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
    Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology.
    Jadad AR; McQuay HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8606325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.