BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11973766)

  • 1. Future trends in bladder reconstructive surgery.
    Atala A
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2002 May; 11(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 11973766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New methods of bladder augmentation.
    Atala A
    BJU Int; 2000 May; 85 Suppl 3():24-34; discussion 36. PubMed ID: 11954194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tissue engineering of the bladder--reality or myth? A systematic review.
    Sloff M; Simaioforidis V; de Vries R; Oosterwijk E; Feitz W
    J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1035-42. PubMed ID: 24769032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ureterocystoplasty (bladder augmentation) with a solitary kidney.
    Kurzrock EA; Butani L; Kakker SP; Perez RV;
    Pediatr Transplant; 2002 Jun; 6(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 12100510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tissue engineering of the bladder--when will we get there?
    Farhat WA
    J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1021-2. PubMed ID: 25046604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Future perspectives in bladder reconstruction.
    Atala A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2003; 539(Pt B):921-40. PubMed ID: 15176334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Words of wisdom. Re: Tissue engineering of the bladder: reality or myth? A systematic review.
    Andersson KE
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):593. PubMed ID: 25306178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bladder wall replacement by tissue engineering and autologous keratinocytes in minipigs.
    Brehmer B; Rohrmann D; Rau G; Jakse G
    BJU Int; 2006 Apr; 97(4):829-36. PubMed ID: 16536783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo regeneration of bladder muscular wall using decellularized colon matrix: an experimental study.
    Kajbafzadeh AM; Khorramirouz R; Sabetkish S; Ataei Talebi M; Akbarzadeh A; Keihani S
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2016 Jun; 32(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 26869178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bladder augmentation using the gastrointestinal tract. Indication, follow up and complications.
    Escudero RM; Patiño GE; Fernández ER; Gil MJ; García EL; Alonso AH; Piniés GO; Sánchez JP; Fernández CH
    Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Dec; 64(10):953-9. PubMed ID: 22228893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders: new possibilities for cystoplasty.
    Kropp BP; Zwischenberger JB
    Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):588-9. PubMed ID: 17088926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colovesical fistula: unexpected complication 7 years after augmentation ileocystoplasty.
    Abdelhalim A; Hafez AT
    Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1153-5. PubMed ID: 23830082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autologous muscle transfer for reconstruction of the lower urinary tract.
    Stenzl A; Ninkovic M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2003; 539(Pt B):853-67. PubMed ID: 15176328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term follow-up of composite bladder augmentation incorporating stomach in a multi-institutional cohort of patients with cloacal exstrophy.
    Casey JT; Chan KH; Hasegawa Y; Large T; Judge B; Kaefer M; Misseri R; Rink RC; Ueoka K; Cain MP
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Feb; 13(1):43.e1-43.e6. PubMed ID: 27889222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modern staged reconstruction of bladder exstrophy--still the gold standard.
    Mathews R; Gearhart JP
    Urology; 2005 Jan; 65(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 15667852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tissue engineering in urology].
    Zini L; Yiou R; Lecoeur C; Biserte J; Abbou C; Chopin DK
    Ann Urol (Paris); 2004 Dec; 38(6):266-74. PubMed ID: 15651481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term followup of patients after redo bladder neck reconstruction for bladder exstrophy complex.
    Burki T; Hamid R; Duffy P; Ransley P; Wilcox D; Mushtaq I
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1138-41; discussion 1141-2. PubMed ID: 16890709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In situ reversed ileocystoplasty for less invasive augmentation cystoplasty: an experimental study.
    Aminsharifi A; Shakeri S; Yousofzade J; Pakbaz S
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 21178325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ureterocystoplasty: videourodynamic assessment.
    Podestá M; Barros D; Herrera M; Castera R
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 2):1721-5. PubMed ID: 16945631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ureteral tissue balloon expansion for laparoscopic bladder augmentation: survival study.
    Desai MM; Gill IS; Goel M; Abreu SC; Ramani AP; Bedaiwy MA; Kaouk JH; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Brainard J; Robertson D; Sung GT
    J Endourol; 2003 Jun; 17(5):283-93. PubMed ID: 12885353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.