These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11974451)
1. A prospective randomized study of different retainer types. Störmann I; Ehmer U J Orofac Orthop; 2002 Jan; 63(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 11974451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers. Al-Nimri K; Al Habashneh R; Obeidat M Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20043549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Salehi P; Zarif Najafi H; Roeinpeikar SM Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():25. PubMed ID: 24326013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention. Rose E; Frucht S; Jonas IE Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers. Lee KD; Mills CM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 19361737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Artun J; Spadafora AT; Shapiro PA Eur J Orthod; 1997 Oct; 19(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 9386336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Twelve-year follow-up of mandibular incisor stability: Comparison between two bonded lingual orthodontic retainers. Schütz-Fransson U; Lindsten R; Bjerklin K; Bondemark L Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 27552722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial". Nagani NI; Ahmed I; Tanveer F; Khursheed HM; Farooqui WA BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface. Bearn DR; McCabe JF; Gordon PH; Aird JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 9009926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Forde K; Storey M; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ORTHODONTIC RETENTION. Studies of retention capacity, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability. Tynelius GE Swed Dent J Suppl; 2014; (236):9-65. PubMed ID: 26685634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized controlled trial on the comparative clinical efficiency and hygiene of a ceramic inter locking retainer and a flexible spiral wire bonded retainer. Sinha A; Sonar S; Batra P; Raghavan S Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 34810385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthodontic retention to have and to hold. Kalha AS Evid Based Dent; 2016 Dec; 17(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 27980334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial. Alrawas MB; Kashoura Y; Tosun Ö; Öz U Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 May; 24(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 32865325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of maxillary and mandibular bonded retainers 10 to 15 years after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective observational study. Kocher KE; Gebistorf MC; Pandis N; Fudalej PS; Katsaros C Prog Orthod; 2019 Jul; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 31328248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]