These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11976050)

  • 1. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Aug; 112(8):1400-7. PubMed ID: 11459679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling.
    Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source reconstruction of mesial-temporal epileptiform activity: comparison of inverse techniques.
    Waberski TD; Gobbelé R; Herrendorf G; Steinhoff BJ; Kolle R; Fuchs M; Paulus W; Buchner H
    Epilepsia; 2000 Dec; 41(12):1574-83. PubMed ID: 11114216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of forward model errors on EEG source localization.
    Akalin Acar Z; Makeig S
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):378-96. PubMed ID: 23355112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of realistically shaped boundary-element and spherical head models in source localization of early somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Buchner H; Waberski TD; Fuchs M; Wischmann HA; Wagner M; Drenckhahn R
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 8793124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of spherical and realistically shaped boundary element head models for transcranial magnetic stimulation navigation.
    Nummenmaa A; Stenroos M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Okada YC; Hämäläinen MS; Raij T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Oct; 124(10):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 23890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
    Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of advanced headmodelling and source reconstruction for the localization of epileptiform activity.
    Waberski TD; Buchner H; Lehnertz K; Hufnagel A; Fuchs M; Beckmann R; Rienäcker A
    Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 9672227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model.
    Scheler G; Fischer MJ; Genow A; Hummel C; Rampp S; Paulini A; Hopfengärtner R; Kaltenhäuser M; Stefan H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Apr; 28(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 16933294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise.
    Tarkiainen A; Liljeström M; Seppä M; Salmelin R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1977-92. PubMed ID: 14499760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of realistic head modeling methods in EEG source imaging - biomed 2010.
    Vatta F; Meneghini F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Disalle F
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2010; 46():398-403. PubMed ID: 20467114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility and validity of electric source localisation with high-resolution electroencephalography.
    Kristeva-Feige R; Grimm C; Huppertz HJ; Otte M; Schreiber A; Jäger D; Feige B; Büchert M; Hennig J; Mergner T; Lücking CH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Dec; 103(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 9546493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the influence of anatomical accuracy and electrode positions on EEG forward solutions.
    Nielsen JD; Puonti O; Xue R; Thielscher A; Madsen KH
    Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 277():120259. PubMed ID: 37392808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of dipole source reconstruction in the 3-layer BEM model against the 5-layer BEM-FMM model.
    Nuñez Ponasso G; McSweeney RC; Wartman WA; Lai P; Haueisen J; Maess B; Knösche TR; Weise K; Noetscher GM; Raij T; Makaroff SN
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38826206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.