291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11976422)
1. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
Dayton L
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Australia. Hall found guilty of lesser misconduct.
Dayton L
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5656):298. PubMed ID: 14726566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
Kritchevsky D
Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct. Australia probes kidney researcher.
Dayton L
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5567):449. PubMed ID: 11964450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Service RF
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Not being clear about authorship is lying and damages the scientific record.
England C; Hodgkinson M; Tamber PS
Natl Med J India; 2007; 20(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 17802982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
Klasen EC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(35):1622-4. PubMed ID: 12233155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Next steps in the Schön affair.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Writing and publishing health sciences research: ethical considerations and experiences from EAMJ.
Lore W
East Afr Med J; 1999 Dec; 76(12):659-60. PubMed ID: 10734532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Germany. Fraud investigations come up dry.
Vogel G
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):150. PubMed ID: 12855778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Report from the Working Group of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan for the investigation of fraud in research papers.
Tsurimoto T; Itoh T; Katayama T; Kimura H; Shinohara A
Genes Cells; 2009 Aug; 14(8):903-8. PubMed ID: 19695023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules.
Bostanci A
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Misconduct and fraud in science].
Draml W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 Dec; 111(24):1007-8. PubMed ID: 10677886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct. Scandals shake Chinese science.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5779):1464-6. PubMed ID: 16763127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct. Fallout from German fraud case continues.
Koenig R
Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5510):1876-7. PubMed ID: 11245175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Publisher fraud. The publication of falsified medical research results].
Diehl V; Schütt I; Walshe R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Sep; 125(38):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11147362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical and legal issues in scientific data audit and quality assurance.
Green HP
Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 15991408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct. MIT terminates researcher over data fabrication.
Couzin J
Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5749):758. PubMed ID: 16272088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific community. University clears Chinese biophysicist of misconduct.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5773):511. PubMed ID: 16645056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is scientific publishing a criminal activity?
Goldberg DM
Clin Biochem; 2006 May; 39(5):473-81. PubMed ID: 16730253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
