291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11976422)
21. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ghost writers in the sky.
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):809-10. PubMed ID: 18221969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Scientific misconduct].
Fernández del Castillo C
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2002 Jun; 70():261-2. PubMed ID: 12216540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Re: Ghost writers in the sky.
Michel MC
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):788; discussion 788. PubMed ID: 18555489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Good scientific practice].
Andersen D
Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Feb; 161(5):610-8. PubMed ID: 9989200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Cornell University scientists face charges of fraud.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2005 Aug; 11(8):810. PubMed ID: 16079859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Resolving authorship.
Billingsley M
Nursingconnections; 1993; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 8133941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Maturitas; 2009 Mar; 62(3):208-24. PubMed ID: 19329007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ghost story: at medical journals, writers paid by industry play big role.
Mathews AW
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Dec; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16506304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Harvard guidelines for investigators in scientific research.
Clin Res; 1989 Apr; 37(2):192-3. PubMed ID: 2702806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters.
Wager E
Maturitas; 2009 Feb; 62(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 19147308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cancer researcher found guilty of negligence.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):258. PubMed ID: 12447407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
Driessen O
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Nov; 138(47):2365-6. PubMed ID: 7969640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Publication ethics policies for medical journals.
Pai SA
Indian J Med Ethics; 2004; 1(3):93. PubMed ID: 16370089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Misconduct row fuels calls for reform.
Dennis C
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6976):666. PubMed ID: 14973447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Publish or perish. The debate from a global perspective.
Jones R
Aust Fam Physician; 1999 May; 28(5):425-6. PubMed ID: 10376362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
