These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11980073)

  • 1. Validity of the Bruckner reflex in the detection of amblyopia.
    Gole GA; Douglas LM
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 23(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 11980073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of red reflex asymmetry by pediatric residents using the Brückner reflex versus the MTI photoscreener.
    Paysse EA; Williams GC; Coats DK; Williams EA
    Pediatrics; 2001 Oct; 108(4):E74. PubMed ID: 11581482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Brückner transillumination test: limited detection of small-angle esotropia.
    Gräf M; Alhammouri Q; Vieregge C; Lorenz B
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Dec; 118(12):2504-9. PubMed ID: 21856007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brückner test.
    Tongue AC; Cibis GW
    Ophthalmology; 1981 Oct; 88(10):1041-4. PubMed ID: 7335307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of the plusoptiX A08 photoscreener in detecting risk factors for amblyopia in central Iowa.
    Bloomberg JD; Suh DW
    J AAPOS; 2013 Jun; 17(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 23791414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between the plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners.
    Matta NS; Arnold RW; Singman EL; Silbert DI
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1591-5. PubMed ID: 20008713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of the MTI photoscreener for amblyogenic factors in infancy and early childhood.
    Weinand F; Gräf M; Demming K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 236(11):801-5. PubMed ID: 9825254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new visual evoked potential system for vision screening in infants and young children.
    Simon JW; Siegfried JB; Mills MD; Calhoun JH; Gurland JE
    J AAPOS; 2004 Dec; 8(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 15616502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the iScreen and the MTI photoscreeners for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children.
    Silbert DI; Arnold RW; Matta NS
    J AAPOS; 2013 Feb; 17(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 23415034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False amblyopia prediction in strabismic patients by fixation preference testing correlates with contralateral ocular dominance.
    AlHarkan DH; Khan AO
    J AAPOS; 2014 Oct; 18(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 25266829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Field Evaluation of Automated Vision Screening Instruments: Impact of Referral Criteria Choice on Screening Outcome.
    Silverstein E; Donahue SP
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2015; 52(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 26393478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors by public health personnel: the Eyecor Camera System.
    Enzenauer RW; Freeman HL; Larson MR; Williams TL
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 7(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10652167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective vision screening in 3-year-old children at a multispecialty practice.
    Lowry EA; Wang W; Nyong'o O
    J AAPOS; 2015 Feb; 19(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 25727580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of the GoCheck Kids Vision Screener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors.
    Peterseim MMW; Rhodes RS; Patel RN; Wilson ME; Edmondson LE; Logan SA; Cheeseman EW; Shortridge E; Trivedi RH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 187():87-91. PubMed ID: 29305313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the 15∆ Base in Prism Test Reliable for Detection of Amblyopia in Anisometropic Patients?
    Burggraaf F; Verkaik-Rijneveld MC; Wubbels RJ; de Jongh E
    Strabismus; 2017 Sep; 25(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 28771067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity of the red reflex in Costa Rican newborns.
    Viquez MV; Wu L
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2020 Jan; 95(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 31826811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The plusoptiX S08 photoscreener as a vision screening tool for children with autism.
    McCurry TC; Lawrence LM; Wilson ME; Mayo L
    J AAPOS; 2013 Aug; 17(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 23928004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the Bruckner test be used as a rapid screening test to detect significant refractive errors in children?
    Kothari MT
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2007; 55(3):213-5. PubMed ID: 17456940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the Red Reflex Test Detect Unequal Refractive Error?
    LaMattina KC; Vagge A; Nelson LB
    J Pediatr; 2019 Nov; 214():175-177. PubMed ID: 31378518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High specificity of the Pediatric Vision Scanner in a private pediatric primary care setting.
    Jost RM; Stager D; Dao L; Katz S; McDonald R; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2015 Dec; 19(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 26691030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.