145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11980853)
1. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression.
Gardiner SK; Crabb DP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1400-7. PubMed ID: 11980853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.
Manassakorn A; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Koucheki B; Law SK; Caprioli J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2896-903. PubMed ID: 16799031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
Mayama C; Araie M; Suzuki Y; Ishida K; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y; Shirakashi M; Abe H; Tsukamoto H; Mishima HK; Yoshimura K; Ohashi Y
Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring glaucomatous visual field progression: the effect of a novel spatial filter.
Strouthidis NG; Scott A; Viswanathan AC; Crabb DP; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):251-7. PubMed ID: 17197540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data.
Spry PG; Bates AB; Johnson CA; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2192-200. PubMed ID: 10892862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pointwise linear progression criteria and the detection of visual field change in a glaucoma trial.
Wilkins MR; Fitzke FW; Khaw PT
Eye (Lond); 2006 Jan; 20(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 15650759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma.
Kovalska M; Grieshaber MC; Schötzau A; Katamay R; Hauenstein D; Flammer J; Orgül S
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 18454368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optic disc and visual field changes after trabeculectomy.
Kotecha A; Spratt A; Bunce C; Garway-Heath DF; Khaw PT; Viswanathan A;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4693-9. PubMed ID: 19474409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.
Spry PG; Johnson CA; Bates AB; Turpin A; Chauhan BC
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 120(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 11831919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual field progression in glaucoma: estimating the overall significance of deterioration with permutation analyses of pointwise linear regression (PoPLR).
O'Leary N; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):6776-84. PubMed ID: 22952123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study.
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Coleman AL; Liu G; Li G; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1627-35. PubMed ID: 15350314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients.
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Chauhan BC; Lieberman MF; Cunliffe I; Hyman L; Leske MC
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1557-65. PubMed ID: 18378317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement.
Strouthidis NG; Scott A; Peter NM; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2904-10. PubMed ID: 16799032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24-2 visual fields.
Tattersall CL; Vernon SA; Menon GJ
Eye (Lond); 2007 Mar; 21(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 16424913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.
Caprioli J; Coleman AL
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1123-1129.e3. PubMed ID: 18082889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 18078852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pointwise linear regression for evaluation of visual field outcomes and comparison with the advanced glaucoma intervention study methods.
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J; Coleman AL; Hoffman D; Gaasterland D
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 15710815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
