231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11981145)
1. The influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures with the esophageal tracheal combitube.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Boehler M; Loeckinger A; Puehringer F
Anesthesiology; 2002 May; 96(5):1074-7. PubMed ID: 11981145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large cuff volumes impede posterior pharyngeal mucosal perfusion with the laryngeal tube airway.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Roth W; Loeckinger A
Can J Anaesth; 2002 Dec; 49(10):1084-7. PubMed ID: 12477684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airway devices.
Ulrich-Pur H; Hrska F; Krafft P; Friehs H; Wulkersdorfer B; Köstler WJ; Rabitsch W; Staudinger T; Schuster E; Frass M
Anesthesiology; 2006 May; 104(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 16645443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Pühringer F
Anesthesiology; 1999 Dec; 91(6):1661-5. PubMed ID: 10598608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Esophageal and tracheal distortion by the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube: a cadaver study.
Vézina D; Trépanier CA; Lessard MR; Bussières J
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Apr; 46(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 10232728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct measurement of mucosal pressures exerted by cuff and non-cuff portions of tracheal tubes with different cuff volumes and head and neck positions.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Giampalmo M; Sparr HJ; Berry A
Br J Anaesth; 1999 May; 82(5):708-11. PubMed ID: 10536547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mucosal pressures from the cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs the laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 82(6):922-4. PubMed ID: 10562790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laryngeal mask airway size selection in males and females: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, pharyngeal mucosal pressures and anatomical position.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Br J Anaesth; 1999 May; 82(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 10536546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures, airway sealing pressures, and fiberoptic position with the intubating versus the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesthesiology; 1999 Apr; 90(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 10201670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of a new method to distinguish esophageal from tracheal intubation by measuring the endotracheal cuff pressure in a porcine model.
Hsu CC; Lee WJ; Wu YL; Guo HR; Lin HJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1153-7. PubMed ID: 16293896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The tracheal tube with a high-volume, low-pressure cuff at various airway inflation pressures.
Inada T; Uesugi F; Kawachi S; Inada K
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1998 Nov; 15(6):629-32. PubMed ID: 9884846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In cadavers, directly measured mucosal pressures are similar for the Unique and the Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway devices.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Moriggl B; Lirk P; von Goedecke A
Can J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 51(8):834-7. PubMed ID: 15470175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do laryngeal mask airway devices attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx? A randomized, controlled cadaver study.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Rädler C; Pühringer F
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):904-7. PubMed ID: 10195545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the PneuX System: A Bench Study Comparison With 4 Other Endotracheal Tube Cuffs.
Chenelle CT; Itagaki T; Fisher DF; Berra L; Kacmarek RM
Respir Care; 2017 Jan; 62(1):102-112. PubMed ID: 27879379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculated vs measured pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway during cuff inflation: assessment of four locations.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Benzer A
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Mar; 82(3):399-401. PubMed ID: 10434824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endotracheal Tube Seal and Suction Performance in a Novel Biorealistic Tracheal Model.
Rozycki SK; Dixon FP; Yopp MA; Maxvold NJ; Rubin BK
Respir Care; 2015 Aug; 60(8):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25944945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 46(11):1064-6. PubMed ID: 10566928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
