These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1198148)

  • 1. Autokinetic paradigms: a reply to Alexander, Zucker and Brody.
    Pollis NP; Montgomery RL; Smith TG
    Sociometry; 1975 Sep; 38(3):358-73. PubMed ID: 1198148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is there an error of the standard? A critique of Piaget's perceptual theory.
    Begelman DA; Steinfeld GJ
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1972 Aug; 86(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 5050996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The two illusions of Müller-Lyer: confusion theory reexamined.
    Sekuler R; Erlebacher A
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 5142060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinstating the original principles of Proctor's unified theory for matching-task phenomena: an evaluation of Krueger and Shapiro's reformulation.
    Proctor RW; Rao KV
    Psychol Rev; 1983 Jan; 90(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 6844477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A test of Piaget's explanation of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Fellows B; Thorn D
    Br J Psychol; 1973 Feb; 64(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 4582553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The apparent lengths of perimeters and diameters define a ratio smaller than pi.
    Teghtsoonian R; Teghtsoonian M
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Sep; 84(3):437-8. PubMed ID: 5142586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Successive presentations of elements of the Mueller-Lyer figure and CA, MA, and IQ: an age extension and unsuccessful replication.
    Hartmann DP; Gelfand DM; Courtney RJ; Malouf RE
    Child Dev; 1972 Sep; 43(3):1060-6. PubMed ID: 5056600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing the presence of navigation risk eliminates strong environmental illusions.
    Jackson RE; Cormack LK
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):9. PubMed ID: 20616118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Theoretical and experimental analyses of 3 perceptual illusions].
    Bredenkamp J
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1984; 192(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 6147942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Figural aftereffects as optical illusions?
    Stadler M
    Am J Psychol; 1972 Sep; 85(3):351-75. PubMed ID: 4655810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of distance and stimulus position on perceptual comparison at five age levels.
    Farkas M; Elkind D
    Child Dev; 1974 Mar; 45(1):184-8. PubMed ID: 4820271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Is figural perception indeed additive?].
    Drösler J
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1986; 33(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 3751161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manipulating the strength of the Ponzo and horizontal-vertical illusions through extraction of local cue information.
    Searleman A; Porac C; Alvin J; Peaslee K
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 19827706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Retinal image, retinal correspondence, angular and morphoscopic visual acuity according to the Gestalt psychology].
    Carlevaro G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol Ann Osp Maria Vittor Torino; 1969; 62(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 5355305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The eye illusion.
    Schleidt WM
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1988; 140(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 3240086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of the magnitude of the moon illusion.
    Solhkhah N; Orbach J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1969 Aug; 29(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 5355067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An illusion of goose orientation.
    Post RB; Moore N
    Perception; 1990; 19(1):133. PubMed ID: 2336329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures?
    Harris JP
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):445-57. PubMed ID: 7212126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assimilation theory remains a guidepost for studying geometrical illusions: a tribute to Alexander Pressey.
    Jaeger TB
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Oct; 119(2):505-8. PubMed ID: 25153617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.