These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11984348)

  • 1. Once isn't enough when measuring staff competence.
    Herringer JM
    Nurs Manage; 2002 Feb; 33(2):22. PubMed ID: 11984348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does your appraisal system measure up?
    Wilson P; Bodden JS
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1999 Apr; 6(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10382522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How should the government check nurses are fit to practise?
    Duffin C
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 26-Aug 1; 20(46):14-5. PubMed ID: 16898188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring competencies of temporary staff.
    Shaffer F; Kobs A
    Nurs Manage; 1997 May; 28(5):41-5. PubMed ID: 9287795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing effectiveness in assessing forensic nursing staff competency.
    Miller PJ
    J Forensic Nurs; 2007; 3(2):72-6, 86. PubMed ID: 17679270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of methods to assess competency.
    O'Hearne Rebholz M
    J Nurses Staff Dev; 2006; 22(5):241-5. PubMed ID: 17019280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does certification mean better performance?
    Redd ML; Alexander JW
    Nurs Manage; 1997 Feb; 28(2):45-9; quiz 50. PubMed ID: 9287746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of coworkers. 1. The comparison with other coworkers is useful for all].
    Gremmel-Thomas E; Petrachi F
    Pflege Z; 1998 Mar; 51(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 9588340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feedback and efficiency: a staff development model.
    Chu LK; Chu GS
    Nurs Manage; 1991 Feb; 22(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 1990332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to deal with poor performers.
    Barzey S
    Nurs Times; 2005 Sep 6-12; 101(36):40-1. PubMed ID: 16163936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten steps to conducting appraisals.
    Pearce C
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2007 Oct; 14(6):21. PubMed ID: 17966208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The team wheel.
    Whyte L
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2007 Feb; 13(9):22-4. PubMed ID: 17338398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship.
    Thobaben M
    Home Healthc Nurse; 1991; 9(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 2061085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Nurses' evaluation in the complex psychiatric milieu].
    Labbé P
    Soins Form Pedagog Encadr; 1999; (30):35-7. PubMed ID: 10734988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The assessment of drug calculation skills--time to rethink the whole process.
    Wright K
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 May; 32(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 22153386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competence: the shot heard around the nursing world.
    Kobs A
    Nurs Manage; 1997 Feb; 28(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 9287735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Grading, evaluation, what do they mean?].
    Malhomme ML
    Soins Form Pedagog Encadr; 2000; (35):38-40. PubMed ID: 11111727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Instruments for evaluating nurse competence.
    Meretoja R; Leino-Kilpi H
    J Nurs Adm; 2001; 31(7-8):346-52. PubMed ID: 11519263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prepare for your best employee evaluation yet.
    Cohen S
    Nurs Manage; 2000 Oct; 31(10):8. PubMed ID: 15127548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.