287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11984546)
1. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
Steinberg NA
South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
Klein DF
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Facility inspections: how often and following which guidelines?
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2001; 30(7):16. PubMed ID: 11469106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct.
Wadman M
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Private investigations.
Dalton R
Nature; 2001 May; 411(6834):129-30. PubMed ID: 11346758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reportability of protocol suspensions. Report may vary.
Daviau J; Wilkins T
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Feb; 38(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 19165187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can one vote overrule a majority? In a designated-Member review...maybe.
Silverman J; Hessler JR; Levy D; James ML; Broggi M
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 Feb; 31(2):19-21. PubMed ID: 11910403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reportability of protocol suspensions. A word from OLAW and USDA.
Brown P; Gipson C
Lab Anim (NY); 2009 Feb; 38(2):47. PubMed ID: 19165188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Business ethics, law, and the corporate use of laboratory animals.
Hoch D
Akron Law Rev; 1987; 21(2):201-44. PubMed ID: 16086458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. USDA publishes final rule on the definition of animal.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2004; 33(7):15. PubMed ID: 15224107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
Price AR
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
