These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11985296)

  • 1. Forecasting trial outcomes: lawyers assign higher probability to possibilities that are described in greater detail.
    Fox CR; Birke R
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Apr; 26(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 11985296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.
    Fox CR
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 10090802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support.
    Brenner LA; Koehler DJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):16-47. PubMed ID: 10090797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory.
    Rottenstreich Y; Tversky A
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):406-15. PubMed ID: 9127585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Familiarity Bias and Belief Reversal in Relative Likelihood Judgment.
    Fox CR; Levav J
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jul; 82(2):268-292. PubMed ID: 10891298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
    Redelmeier DA; Koehler DJ; Liberman V; Tversky A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7564936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SEC proton prediction model: verification and analysis.
    Balch CC
    Radiat Meas; 1999 Jun; 30(3):231-50. PubMed ID: 11543129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An account of subjective probability judgment for joint events: Conjunctive and disjunctive.
    Fisk JE; Marshall DA; Rogers P; Stock R
    Scand J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 60(5):405-420. PubMed ID: 31242534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Naive Probability: Model-Based Estimates of Unique Events.
    Khemlani SS; Lotstein M; Johnson-Laird PN
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1216-58. PubMed ID: 25363706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A human judgment approach to epidemiological forecasting.
    Farrow DC; Brooks LC; Hyun S; Tibshirani RJ; Burke DS; Rosenfeld R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Mar; 13(3):e1005248. PubMed ID: 28282375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty.
    See KE; Fox CR; Rottenstreich YS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1385-402. PubMed ID: 17087591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament.
    Mellers B; Ungar L; Baron J; Ramos J; Gurcay B; Fincher K; Scott SE; Moore D; Atanasov P; Swift SA; Murray T; Stone E; Tetlock PE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 24659192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motivated perception of probabilistic information.
    Lench HC; Smallman R; Darbor KE; Bench SW
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):429-42. PubMed ID: 25151252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing.
    Khrennikov A
    Biosystems; 2009 Mar; 95(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 19010383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inconsistent probability estimates of a hypothesis: the role of contrasting support.
    Bonini N; Gonzalez M
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15779531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hazards of underspecified models: the case of symmetry in everyday predictions.
    Sedlmeier P; Kilinç B
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):770-80. PubMed ID: 15250783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.