These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Inferring conjunctive probabilities from noisy samples: evidence for the configural weighted average model. Jenny MA; Rieskamp J; Nilsson H J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 24128388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty. Fox CR; Rottenstreich Y Psychol Sci; 2003 May; 14(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12741740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. When alternative hypotheses shape your beliefs: Context effects in probability judgments. Cai X; Pleskac TJ Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105306. PubMed ID: 36379148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Truth of Conditional Assertions. Goodwin GP; Johnson-Laird PN Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2502-2533. PubMed ID: 30159915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence. Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Product liability forecasting for asbestos-related personal injury claims: a multidisciplinary approach. Stallard E Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2001 Dec; 954():223-44. PubMed ID: 11797859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Forecasting herd structure and milk production for production risk management. St-Pierre NR; Jones LR J Dairy Sci; 2001 Aug; 84(8):1805-13. PubMed ID: 11518304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Are random events perceived as rare? On the relationship between perceived randomness and outcome probability. Teigen KH; Keren G Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):299-313. PubMed ID: 31900799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment. Costello F; Watts P Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Two studies of good clinical judgment. Christensen-Szalanski JJ; Diehr PH; Bushyhead JB; Wood RW Med Decis Making; 1982; 2(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 6133204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combinatorics and probability: six- to ten-year-olds reliably predict whether a relation will occur. Gonzalez M; Girotto V Cognition; 2011 Sep; 120(3):372-9. PubMed ID: 21055735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. When does information about probability count in choices under risk? Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Probabilistic model for fluences and peak fluxes of solar energetic particles. Nymmik RA Radiat Meas; 1999 Jun; 30(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11543135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Forecasting from ignorance: the use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events. Pachur T; Biele G Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 16904059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]