These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11985297)

  • 1. The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials.
    Butler BM; Moran G
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Apr; 26(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 11985297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials.
    Butler B; Moran G
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 17285584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
    Butler B; Moran G
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 17440900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process.
    Butler B
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):857-67. PubMed ID: 18046739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: Pursuing justice in death penalty trials.
    Watson C; Eth S; Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 22396341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exposure to capital voir dire may not increase convictions despite increasing pretrial presumption of guilt.
    Vitriol JA; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):472-483. PubMed ID: 30272467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
    Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
    Miller MK; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
    Batista LM; Myers W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of the effects of subjective and objective instruction forms on mock-juries' murder/manslaughter distinctions.
    Spackman MP; Belcher JC; Calapp JW; Taylor A
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):605-23. PubMed ID: 12508697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
    Abeles N
    Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining jurors' ability to meet the constitutional requirement of narrowing in capital sentencing.
    Holleran LB; Vaughan TJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 38(4):317-336. PubMed ID: 32291823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mitigating circumstances in death penalty decisions: using evidence-based research to inform social work practice in capital trials.
    Schroeder J; Guin CC; Pogue R; Bordelon D
    Soc Work; 2006 Oct; 51(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 17152633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Religious characteristics and the death penalty.
    Miller MK; Hayward RD
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 17546480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When domestic goes capital: Juror decision making in capital murder trials involving domestic homicide.
    Richards TN; Smith MD; Fogel SJ; Bjerregaard B
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 25844513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Jury panel member perceptions of interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict support for execution in a capital murder trial simulation.
    Cox J; Clark JC; Edens JF; Smith ST; Magyar MS
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(4):411-28. PubMed ID: 23754472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.