134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11985562)
21. How preventable is invasive cervical cancer? A community study of preventable factors.
Martin PL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Jun; 113(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 4636632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening for cervical cancer in young women.
Lancet; 1978 Nov; 2(8098):1029-30. PubMed ID: 82038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Invasive cervix cancer in spite of gynecologic health control].
Björkholm E; Pettersson F
Lakartidningen; 1979 Jan; 76(5):281-2. PubMed ID: 759774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Despite potential flaws, the false-negative proportion remains the best practical measure of the accuracy of cervical cytology screening.
Krieger P; Naryshkin S
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 9349511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
Calvache AE
Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 17017433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Television soap opera and the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: follow-up data.
Owen-Smith V; Howe A; Richardson J
J Public Health Med; 2003 Jun; 25(2):183. PubMed ID: 12848413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Moseley R
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 11952756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical cancer screening: How our approach may change.
Hofmeister S
J Fam Pract; 2016 Aug; 65(8):551-3. PubMed ID: 27660838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cervical cancer screening trends, 1992-2000.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):424. PubMed ID: 12644531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors.
Wilson RM
BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7246):1352-3. PubMed ID: 10818006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Limitations within the cervical cytology screening service.
Carr P
Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1987 Jun; 23(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 3650662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimal interval for routine cytologic screening in the United States.
Kim JJ; Sharma M; Ortendahl J
JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Feb; 173(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 23530274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
Herbert A
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Prevention of cervical cancer by screening.
Philip J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1993 May; 72(4):236-7. PubMed ID: 8389507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
Herbert A; Johnson J; Patnick J
Cytopathology; 1995 Oct; 6(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 8785367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How preventable is invasive cervical cancer? A community study of preventable factors.
Martin PL
Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1971; 39(0):114-21. PubMed ID: 5164820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervical screening: what is the point?
McCartney P
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):246-7. PubMed ID: 7616815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
