These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11987435)

  • 1. Classic or Bayesian research design and analysis. Does it make a difference?
    Bloom BS; de Pouvourville N; Libert S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 11987435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of patient level data: a review of the use of Bayesian methods to inform health technology assessments.
    McCarron CE; Pullenayegum EM; Marshall DA; Goeree R; Tarride JE
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 19845985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    O'Rourke K; Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2733-42; author reply 2743. PubMed ID: 16118810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
    Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.
    DerSimonian R
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1237-48; discussion 1249-52. PubMed ID: 8817798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model.
    Schmidt FL; Raju NS
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 17371079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: comparing results of randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions for low back pain.
    Furlan AD; Tomlinson G; Jadad AA; Bombardier C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 18303468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Mottillo S; Filion KB; Bélisle P; Joseph L; Gervais A; O'Loughlin J; Paradis G; Pihl R; Pilote L; Rinfret S; Tremblay M; Eisenberg MJ
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Mar; 30(6):718-30. PubMed ID: 19109354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian approach to meta-analysis of plant pathology studies.
    Mila AL; Ngugi HK
    Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 20822433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of parenting programmes in improving maternal psychosocial health.
    Barlow J; Coren E; Stewart-Brown S
    Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Mar; 52(476):223-33. PubMed ID: 12030667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.
    Furukawa TA; Barbui C; Cipriani A; Brambilla P; Watanabe N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16360555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
    Korttila K; Apfel CC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries.
    Graham PL; Moran JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.