708 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11988059)
1. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
Kulasingam SL; Kim JJ; Lawrence WF; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Goldie SJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 16418511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.
Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Womack SM; Jacobson D; Yi B; Hwang YT; Gold K; Barter J; Shah K
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2372-81. PubMed ID: 11988058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic analysis of human papillomavirus triage, repeat cytology, and immediate colposcopy in management of women with minor cytological abnormalities in Sweden.
Ostensson E; Fröberg M; Hjerpe A; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1316-25. PubMed ID: 20846064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Management Strategies for Detection CIN2+ of Women with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) Pap Smear in Thailand.
Tantitamit T; Termrungruanglert W; Oranratanaphan S; Niruthisard S; Tanbirojn P; Havanond P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):6857-62. PubMed ID: 26514457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.
Cox JT;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 12952506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening.
Naucler P; Ryd W; Törnberg S; Strand A; Wadell G; Elfgren K; Rådberg T; Strander B; Forslund O; Hansson BG; Hagmar B; Johansson B; Rylander E; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jan; 101(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 19141778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more.
Goldie SJ; Kim JJ; Wright TC
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 103(4):619-31. PubMed ID: 15051550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):888-95. PubMed ID: 15956650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Goldie SJ; Kuhn L; Denny L; Pollack A; Wright TC
JAMA; 2001 Jun; 285(24):3107-15. PubMed ID: 11427139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of strategies for managing women with equivocal cytological results in Brazil.
Vanni T; Legood R; Franco EL; Villa LL; Luz PM; Schwartsmann G
Int J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 129(3):671-9. PubMed ID: 20886598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.
Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Gaffikin L; Limpahayom KK; Lumbiganon P; Warakamin S; King J; Yi B; Ringers P; Blumenthal PD
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(19):1469-83. PubMed ID: 12359856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.
van Rosmalen J; de Kok IM; van Ballegooijen M
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 22251259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
