BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

710 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11988059)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
    Kulasingam SL; Kim JJ; Lawrence WF; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Goldie SJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 16418511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
    Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.
    Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Womack SM; Jacobson D; Yi B; Hwang YT; Gold K; Barter J; Shah K
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2372-81. PubMed ID: 11988058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic analysis of human papillomavirus triage, repeat cytology, and immediate colposcopy in management of women with minor cytological abnormalities in Sweden.
    Ostensson E; Fröberg M; Hjerpe A; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1316-25. PubMed ID: 20846064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Management Strategies for Detection CIN2+ of Women with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) Pap Smear in Thailand.
    Tantitamit T; Termrungruanglert W; Oranratanaphan S; Niruthisard S; Tanbirojn P; Havanond P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):6857-62. PubMed ID: 26514457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.
    Cox JT;
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 12952506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening.
    Naucler P; Ryd W; Törnberg S; Strand A; Wadell G; Elfgren K; Rådberg T; Strander B; Forslund O; Hansson BG; Hagmar B; Johansson B; Rylander E; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jan; 101(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 19141778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more.
    Goldie SJ; Kim JJ; Wright TC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 103(4):619-31. PubMed ID: 15051550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):888-95. PubMed ID: 15956650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
    Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
    JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Goldie SJ; Kuhn L; Denny L; Pollack A; Wright TC
    JAMA; 2001 Jun; 285(24):3107-15. PubMed ID: 11427139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic evaluation of strategies for managing women with equivocal cytological results in Brazil.
    Vanni T; Legood R; Franco EL; Villa LL; Luz PM; Schwartsmann G
    Int J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 129(3):671-9. PubMed ID: 20886598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
    Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.
    Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Gaffikin L; Limpahayom KK; Lumbiganon P; Warakamin S; King J; Yi B; Ringers P; Blumenthal PD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(19):1469-83. PubMed ID: 12359856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
    Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
    Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.
    van Rosmalen J; de Kok IM; van Ballegooijen M
    BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 22251259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.