These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11988417)

  • 1. The reliability of dietary data for self- and next-of-kin respondents.
    Fryzek JP; Lipworth L; Signorello LB; Mclaughlin JK
    Ann Epidemiol; 2002 May; 12(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11988417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of surrogate with self-respondents regarding medical history and prior medication use.
    Lipworth L; Fryzek JP; Fored CM; Blot WJ; McLaughlin JK
    Int J Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 30(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 11369734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of next-of-kin with self-respondents regarding questions on cigarette, coffee, and alcohol consumption.
    McLaughlin JK; Mandel JS; Mehl ES; Blot WJ
    Epidemiology; 1990 Sep; 1(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 2078619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective information from questionnaires. I. Comparability of primary respondents and their next-of-kin.
    Herrmann N
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Jun; 121(6):937-47. PubMed ID: 4014185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-year reliability of key demographic and life history data collected from self-respondents and next-of-kin.
    Sonderman JS; Tarone RE; McLaughlin JK
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jul; 23(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 24841642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of asbestos exposure assessments by next-of-kin respondents, by an occupational hygienist, and by a job-exposure matrix from the National Occupational Hazard Survey.
    Nam JM; Rice C; Gail MH
    Am J Ind Med; 2005 May; 47(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 15828074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of surrogate with self-respondents for occupational factors.
    Fryzek JP; Lipworth LL; Garabrant DH; McLaughlin JK
    J Occup Environ Med; 2000 Apr; 42(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 10774511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of dietary information from surrogate respondents.
    Hislop TG; Coldman AJ; Zheng YY; Ng VT; Labo T
    Nutr Cancer; 1992; 18(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 1437650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of smoking history in cancer patients.
    Prochazka M; Hall P; Granath F; Czene K
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(6):1004-8. PubMed ID: 18607867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of surrogate respondents to obtain questionnaire data in case-control studies of neurologic diseases.
    Rocca WA; Fratiglioni L; Bracco L; Pedone D; Groppi C; Schoenberg BS
    J Chronic Dis; 1986; 39(11):907-12. PubMed ID: 3793841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of next-of-kin in assessing handedness.
    Dorthe NJ; Blumenthal TD; Jason DR; Lantz PE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Aug; 81(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 8532456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Errors in reported dietary intakes. II. Long-term recall.
    Wu ML; Whittemore AS; Jung DL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Nov; 128(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 3189287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Validity of occupational histories from proxy respondents].
    Cordeiro R
    Rev Saude Publica; 2000 Oct; 34(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 11105117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of eight-year diet recall in cancer cases and controls.
    Lindsted KD; Kuzma JW
    Epidemiology; 1990 Sep; 1(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 2078616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective information from questionnaires. II. Intrarater reliability and comparison of questionnaire types.
    Herrmann N
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Jun; 121(6):948-53. PubMed ID: 4014186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation study on a new method of dietary assessment with instant photography applied in urban pregnant women in Nanjing city].
    Jiang T; Dai Y; Miao M; Zhang Y; Song C; Wang Z
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Jul; 44(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 26454956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of data from next-of-kin: results from a case-control study of occupational and lifestyle risk factors for cancer.
    Kaerlev L; Lynge E; Sabroe S; Olsen J
    Am J Ind Med; 2003 Sep; 44(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 12929150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential misclassification bias and dietary recall for the distant past using a food frequency questionnaire.
    Hislop TG; Lamb CW; Ng VT
    Nutr Cancer; 1990; 13(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 2345703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dietary Intake Reporting Accuracy of the Bridge2U Mobile Application Food Log Compared to Control Meal and Dietary Recall Methods.
    Lemacks JL; Adams K; Lovetere A
    Nutrients; 2019 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 30669430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility and relative validity of an extensive semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire using dietary records and biochemical markers among Greek schoolteachers.
    Katsouyanni K; Rimm EB; Gnardellis C; Trichopoulos D; Polychronopoulos E; Trichopoulou A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S118-27. PubMed ID: 9126540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.