These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11989437)

  • 1. Evidentiary privilege for peer review documents rejected by the Fourth Circuit. Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 May; 19(7):6-8. PubMed ID: 11989437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New ruling in NC affirms peer review privacy.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):153-4. PubMed ID: 10621281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maryland Court rejects challenge to peer review processes. Sadler v. Dimensions Health Corporation.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 Nov; 20(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 12412313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. This doctor's peer review suit cost him $240,000.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2002 Jun; 79(12):26-8. PubMed ID: 12119735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Civil rights claims and physician peer review.
    Kadzielski M; Marino SP
    Cost Qual Q J; 1999 Jun; 5(2):10-4. PubMed ID: 10539004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developments in peer review.
    Kinderman K
    J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 17(5):251-3. PubMed ID: 12058695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 11280209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege--Part Two.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 16(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 11345885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Third Circuit rules physician protected by Title III of ADA. Menkowitz v. Pottstown Memorial Medical Center.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Apr; 16(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 10351071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review records subject to disclosure.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Feb; 133(2):232-4. PubMed ID: 11868845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Courts examine use of peer review documents. Young v. Saldanha; Ashokan v. Nevada.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1994 Jun; 11(8):5-8. PubMed ID: 10184108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antitrust protection extended to hospital authorities and physician peer review participants. Crosby v. Hospital Authority of Valdosta.
    Roeder KH; Sledge SK
    Ga Hosp Today; 1996 Nov; 40(11):3. PubMed ID: 10184649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When does a review constitute an investigation and what is a surrender?
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Sep; 17(11):1-3. PubMed ID: 11186478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review protection statute blocks aggrieved physician.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Jun; 17(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 11066398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejects hospital's immunity claim. Cooper v. Delaware Valley Medical Center.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1995 Oct; 12(12):6-8. PubMed ID: 10184428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital peer review is a kangaroo court.
    Townend DW
    Med Econ; 2000 Feb; 77(3):133-6, 141. PubMed ID: 10848200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer-review showdown. High court review could lead to opening records.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Dec; 37(48):10. PubMed ID: 18203353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remember diplomacy in peer review process.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Mar; 27(3):33-4. PubMed ID: 11905383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.