These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11989684)

  • 1. Flies across the water: genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation in allopatric desert Drosophila.
    Markow TA; Castrezana S; Pfeiler E
    Evolution; 2002 Mar; 56(3):546-52. PubMed ID: 11989684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
    Massie KR; Markow TA
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting population genetic patterns and evolutionary histories among sympatric Sonoran Desert cactophilic Drosophila.
    Hurtado LA; Erez T; Castrezana S; Markow TA
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Jun; 13(6):1365-75. PubMed ID: 15140083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations.
    Castrezana SJ; Markow TA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microsatellite variation among diverging populations of Drosophila mojavensis.
    Ross CL; Markow TA
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Sep; 19(5):1691-700. PubMed ID: 16910998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionary relationships of Drosophila mojavensis geographic host races and their sister species Drosophila arizonae.
    Reed LK; Nyboer M; Markow TA
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 16(5):1007-22. PubMed ID: 17305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecology and population genetics of Sonoran Desert Drosophila.
    Pfeiler E; Markow TA
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Jul; 10(7):1787-91. PubMed ID: 11472545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive isolation among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.
    Jennings JH; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3095-108. PubMed ID: 25302639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.
    Jennings JH; Mazzi D; Ritchie MG; Hoikkala A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():68. PubMed ID: 21396136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The molecular basis of host adaptation in cactophilic Drosophila: molecular evolution of a glutathione S-transferase gene (GstD1) in Drosophila mojavensis.
    Matzkin LM
    Genetics; 2008 Feb; 178(2):1073-83. PubMed ID: 18245335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic Diversity and Demographic History in the Cactophilic Drosophila repleta Species Group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in North America Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Barcodes.
    Pfeiler E
    J Hered; 2019 Jan; 110(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 29868793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of volatiles of necrotic Stenocereus thurberi and Opuntia littoralis and toxicity and olfactory preference of Drosophila melanogster, D. mojavensis wrigleyi, and D. mojavensis sonorensis to necrotic cactus volatiles.
    Wright CR; Setzer WN
    Nat Prod Commun; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1185-92. PubMed ID: 25233605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. III. Life-history divergence in allopatry and reproductive isolation.
    Etges WJ; De Oliveira CC; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3549-69. PubMed ID: 20681983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model-based comparisons of phylogeographic scenarios resolve the intraspecific divergence of cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis.
    Smith G; Lohse K; Etges WJ; Ritchie MG
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Jul; 21(13):3293-307. PubMed ID: 22571504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic analysis of the four ecologically distinct cactus host populations of Drosophila mojavensis.
    Allan CW; Matzkin LM
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):732. PubMed ID: 31606030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multilocus test for introgression between the cactophilic species Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae.
    Counterman BA; Noor MA
    Am Nat; 2006 Nov; 168(5):682-96. PubMed ID: 17080365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No character displacement for reproductive isolation between Drosophila bipectinata and Drosophila malerkotliana.
    Singh BN; Chatterjee S
    Genome; 1991 Dec; 34(6):849-52. PubMed ID: 1778468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba.
    Comeault AA; Venkat A; Matute DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.