These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11989865)

  • 1. A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems.
    Hulsbeek JJ; Kruit J; Roeleveld PJ; van Loosdrech MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):127-36. PubMed ID: 11989865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: a SWOT analysis.
    Sin G; Van Hulle SW; De Pauw DJ; van Griensven A; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Res; 2005 Jul; 39(12):2459-74. PubMed ID: 15993465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling of full-scale wastewater treatment plants with different treatment processes using the Activated Sludge Model no. 3.
    Wichern M; Obenaus F; Wulf P; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11496677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience with guidelines for wastewater characterisation in The Netherlands.
    Roeleveld PJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):77-87. PubMed ID: 11989880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parameter subset selection for the dynamic calibration of activated sludge models (ASMs): experience versus systems analysis.
    Ruano MV; Ribes J; De Pauw DJ; Sin G
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):107-15. PubMed ID: 17978438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error diagnostics and data reconciliation for activated sludge modelling using mass balances.
    Meijer SC; van der Spoel H; Susanti S; Heijne JJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):145-56. PubMed ID: 11989868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modelling wastewater transformation in sewers based on ASM3.
    Huisman JL; Gujer W
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):51-60. PubMed ID: 11989878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of activated sludge microbial community analysis in full-scale biological wastewater treatment plants using patterns of fatty acid isopropyl esters (FAPEs).
    Werker AG; Becker J; Huitema C
    Water Res; 2003 May; 37(9):2162-72. PubMed ID: 12691902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lag phase, dynamic alpha factor and ammonium adsorption behaviour: introduction of special activated sludge characteristics in the ASM3 + EAWAG-BioP-model.
    Alex J; Holm NC; Rönner-Holm SG
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 19151495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-based evaluation of a new upgrading concept for N-removal.
    Salem S; Berends D; Heijnen JJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):169-76. PubMed ID: 11989870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aerobic granular sludge technology: an alternative to activated sludge?
    de Bruin LM; de Kreuk MK; van der Roest HF; Uijterlinde C; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15303716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking of control strategies for ATAD technology: a first approach to the automatic control of sludge treatment systems.
    Zambrano JA; Gil-Martinez M; Garcia-Sanz M; Irizar I
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 19633383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling carbon oxidation in pulp mill activated sludge systems: calibration of Activated Sludge Model No 3.
    Barañao PA; Hall ER
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 15461393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On-line monitoring equipment for wastewater treatment processes: state of the art.
    Vanrolleghem PA; Lee DS
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(2):1-34. PubMed ID: 12636059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of the Activated Sludge Model no. 3 for German wastewater on six different WWTPs.
    Wichern M; Lübken M; Blömer R; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):211-8. PubMed ID: 12906292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of phosphorus release batch tests for modelling an EBPR pilot plant.
    Tykesson E; Aspegren H; Henze M; Nielsen PH; Jansen Jl
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):99-106. PubMed ID: 11989882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feedforward-feedback control of an activated sludge process: a simulation study.
    Vrecko D; Hvala N; Carlsson B
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):19-26. PubMed ID: 12926665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parameter estimation procedure for complex non-linear systems: calibration of ASM No. 1 for N-removal in a full-scale oxidation ditch.
    Abusam A; Keesman KJ; van Straten G; Spanjers H; Meinema K
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):357-65. PubMed ID: 11385868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wastewater treatment modelling in practice: a collaborative discussion of the state of the art.
    Phillips HM; Sahlstedt KE; Frank K; Bratby J; Brennan W; Rogowski S; Pier D; Anderson W; Mulas M; Copp JB; Shirodkar N
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 19237763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.