These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11989882)

  • 21. Experience and extensions to the ASM2 family of models.
    Dudley J; Buck G; Ashley R; Jack A
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):177-86. PubMed ID: 11989871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combined hydraulic and biological modelling and full-scale validation of SBR process.
    Keller J; Yuan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):219-28. PubMed ID: 11989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modelling of enhanced CSO treatment in secondary clarifiers with a modified Activated Sludge Model no. 3.
    Ahnert M; Günther N; Kuehn V; Krebs P; Svardal K; Spatzierer G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):609-15. PubMed ID: 18725729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal in RBC with SBR modification.
    Yun Z; Lee H; Choi E
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):121-30. PubMed ID: 15656304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and characteristics of phosphorus-accumulating microbial granules in sequencing batch reactors.
    Lin YM; Liu Y; Tay JH
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 62(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 12783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation of intracellular phosphorus content of phosphorus-accumulating organisms at different P:COD feeding ratios.
    Panswad T; Tongkhammak N; Anotai J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 16979282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of carbon source and nitrate concentration on denitrifying phosphorus removal by DPB sludge.
    Wang YY; Peng YZ; Wang SY; Pan ML
    J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(4):548-52. PubMed ID: 15495953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: a SWOT analysis.
    Sin G; Van Hulle SW; De Pauw DJ; van Griensven A; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Res; 2005 Jul; 39(12):2459-74. PubMed ID: 15993465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multi-component kinetics of activated sludge treatment of bleached kraft mill effluent.
    Helle SS; Duff SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):11-20. PubMed ID: 15461394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) for biological nutrient removal from simulated wastewater containing glucose as carbon source.
    Kumar BM; Chaudhari S
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(3):73-9. PubMed ID: 14518857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Population dynamics in wastewater treatment plants with enhanced biological phosphorus removal operated with and without nitrogen removal.
    Lee N; Jansen Jl; Aspegren H; Henze M; Nielsen PH; Wagner M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):163-70. PubMed ID: 12216618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities.
    García Martín H; Ivanova N; Kunin V; Warnecke F; Barry KW; McHardy AC; Yeates C; He S; Salamov AA; Szeto E; Dalin E; Putnam NH; Shapiro HJ; Pangilinan JL; Rigoutsos I; Kyrpides NC; Blackall LL; McMahon KD; Hugenholtz P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1263-9. PubMed ID: 16998472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors affecting the microbial populations at full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) wastewater treatment plants in The Netherlands.
    López-Vázquez CM; Hooijmans CM; Brdjanovic D; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2349-60. PubMed ID: 18272198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of glucose on the performance of enhanced biological phosphorus removal activated sludge enriched with acetate.
    Gebremariam SY; Beutel MW; Christian D; Hess TF
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 121():19-24. PubMed ID: 22858463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parameter subset selection for the dynamic calibration of activated sludge models (ASMs): experience versus systems analysis.
    Ruano MV; Ribes J; De Pauw DJ; Sin G
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):107-15. PubMed ID: 17978438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Full-scale application of the IAWQ ASM No. 2d model.
    Carrette R; Bixio D; Thoeye C; Ockier P
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):17-24. PubMed ID: 11547980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of extracellular exopolymers on biological phosphorus removal.
    Liu YN; Xue G; Yu SL; Zhao FB
    J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(4):670-4. PubMed ID: 17078544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch reactor using propionate as the sole carbon source.
    Pijuan M; Saunders AM; Guisasola A; Baeza JA; Casas C; Blackall LL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Jan; 85(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 14705012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selection between alcohols and volatile fatty acids as external carbon sources for EBPR.
    Puig S; Coma M; Monclús H; van Loosdrecht MC; Colprim J; Balaguer MD
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):557-66. PubMed ID: 17764715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of IFAS wastewater treatment processes for biological phosphorus removal.
    Sriwiriyarat T; Randall CW
    Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):3873-84. PubMed ID: 16126245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.