146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11991463)
1. The integrity of bonded amalgam restorations: a clinical evaluation after five years.
Mach Z; Regent J; Staninec M; Mrklas L; Setcos JC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Apr; 133(4):460-7; quiz 493. PubMed ID: 11991463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
Agnihotry A; Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD007517. PubMed ID: 26954446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of bonded and nonbonded amalgam in the treatment of teeth with incomplete fractures.
Davis R; Overton JD
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Apr; 131(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 10770009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of bonded and non-bonded amalgam restorations in general dental practice.
Worskett P
Br Dent J; 2013 Apr; 214(7):E19. PubMed ID: 23579163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
Mahler DB; Engle JH
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Rueggeberg FA; Adair SM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 129(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9448347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Systematic Review of Amalgam Bonded Restorations: In vitro and Clinical Findings.
Brian HC; Lam OL; Jagannathan N; Botelho MG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1013-1024. PubMed ID: 30150506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation and marginal leakage of Amalgambond Plus: three-year results.
Olmez A; Cula S; Ulusu T
Quintessence Int; 1997 Oct; 28(10):651-6. PubMed ID: 9477885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months.
Browning WD; Johnson WW; Gregory PN
J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 May; 131(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 10832254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: a one-year evaluation.
Ahrari F; Nojoomian M; Moosavi H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):009-16. PubMed ID: 20978719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years.
Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Watson RE; Garvan C; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 17473040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
