1019 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11992053)
1. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy.
Amin A; Partin A; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1286-90. PubMed ID: 21862072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors?
Chan TY; Chan DY; Stutzman KL; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2181-4. PubMed ID: 11696731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination.
Tsuzuki T; Hernandez DJ; Aydin H; Trock B; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):450-3. PubMed ID: 15643200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy predict prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
de la Taille A; Rubin MA; Bagiella E; Olsson CA; Buttyan R; Burchardt T; Knight C; O'Toole KM; Katz AE
J Urol; 1999 Jul; 162(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 10379750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The percentage of positive biopsy cores as a predictor of disease recurrence in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
Antunes AA; Srougi M; Dall'Oglio MF; Crippa A; Campagnari JC; Leite KR
BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1258-63. PubMed ID: 16287441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
