These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11992845)

  • 41. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.
    Yossepowitch O; Briganti A; Eastham JA; Epstein J; Graefen M; Montironi R; Touijer K
    Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 23932439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.
    Mirmilstein G; Rai BP; Gbolahan O; Srirangam V; Narula A; Agarwal S; Lane TM; Vasdev N; Adshead J
    BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 29124889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
    Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Wieder JA; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9679867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Centralized prostatectomy with intraoperative NeuroSAFE margin assessment improves surgical margin control.
    Kroon LJ; Remmers S; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; van der Slot MA; Hollemans E; Kweldam CF; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
    Histopathology; 2024 Nov; 85(5):760-768. PubMed ID: 39108215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
    Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
    Rabbani F; Vora KC; Yunis LH; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Touijer K
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 19689577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bladder neck-sparing modification of radical prostatectomy adversely affects surgical margins in pathologic T3a prostate cancer.
    Marcovich R; Wojno KJ; Wei JT; Rubin MA; Montie JE; Sanda MG
    Urology; 2000 Jun; 55(6):904-8. PubMed ID: 10840106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Bilateral cancer in prostate biopsy associates with the presence of extracapsular disease and positive surgical margins in low risk patients: a consideration for bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy decision.
    Sfoungaristos S; Perimenis P
    Urol J; 2013 Sep; 10(3):966-72. PubMed ID: 24078504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Peroperative biopsy of the sub-apical urethra during prostatectomy for cancer].
    Ponthieu A; Delgrande J; Ivaldi A
    Prog Urol; 1996 Apr; 6(2):250-5; discussion 255-6. PubMed ID: 8777418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.
    Roethke MC; Lichy MP; Kniess M; Werner MK; Claussen CD; Stenzl A; Schlemmer HP; Schilling D
    World J Urol; 2013 Oct; 31(5):1111-6. PubMed ID: 22249342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.
    Tatsugami K; Yoshioka K; Shiroki R; Eto M; Yoshino Y; Tozawa K; Fukasawa S; Fujisawa M; Takenaka A; Nasu Y; Kashiwagi A; Gotoh M; Terachi T;
    Int J Urol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28122393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative.
    Pak S; Park S; Kim M; Go H; Cho YM; Ahn H
    BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 29978558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysis of risk factors associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy.
    Ackerman DA; Barry JM; Wicklund RA; Olson N; Lowe BA
    J Urol; 1993 Dec; 150(6):1845-50. PubMed ID: 7693981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical safety and feasibility of a newly developed, simple algorithm for decision-making on neurovascular bundle preservation in radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto K; Hisasue S; Masumori N; Kobayashi K; Kato R; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 40(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19959505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital Frozen Sections with Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique.
    Rocco B; Sarchi L; Assumma S; Cimadamore A; Montironi R; Reggiani Bonetti L; Turri F; De Carne C; Puliatti S; Maiorana A; Pellacani G; Micali S; Bianchi G; Sighinolfi MC
    Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):724-729. PubMed ID: 33965288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Systematic biopsies and digital rectal examination to identify the nerve-sparing side for radical prostatectomy without risk of positive margin in patients with clinical stage T2, N0 prostatic carcinoma.
    Huland H; Hübner D; Henke RP
    Urology; 1994 Aug; 44(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 8048196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure.
    Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; Graefen M; Erbersdobler A; Haese A; Huland H
    Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 15661411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.