These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11993298)

  • 1. Fume levels during bone cement mixing.
    Eveleigh R
    Br J Perioper Nurs; 2002 Apr; 12(4):145-7, 149-50. PubMed ID: 11993298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-packed vacuum bone cement mixing systems. A further step in reducing methylmethacrylate exposure in surgery.
    Schlegel UJ; Sturm M; Eysel P; Breusch SJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Nov; 54(8):955-61. PubMed ID: 20595195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of vacuum bone cement mixing systems in reducing methylmethacrylate fume exposure: comparison of 7 different mixing devices and handmixing.
    Schlegel UJ; Sturm M; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Oct; 75(5):559-66. PubMed ID: 15513487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The hazards of surgical smoke. Not to be sniffed at!
    Biggins J; Renfree S
    Br J Perioper Nurs; 2002 Apr; 12(4):136-8, 141-3. PubMed ID: 11993297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Innovations in acrylic bone cement and application equipment.
    Kindt-Larsen T; Smith DB; Jensen JS
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 7703541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum.
    Kwong FN; Power RA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 16365134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.
    Geiger MH; Keating EM; Ritter MA; Ginther JA; Faris PM; Meding JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jan; (382):258-66. PubMed ID: 11153996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The principles of mixing and handling to minimise potential hazards of methyl methacrylate bone cement.
    McHugh E
    Br J Theatre Nurs; 1998 Feb; 7(11):9-12. PubMed ID: 9555299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of the bioactive bone cement--bone interface: quantitative and histological evaluation.
    Nishimura N; Taguchi Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 10148343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Static and fatigue properties of two new low-viscosity PMMA bone cements improved by vacuum mixing.
    Fritsch EW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Aug; 31(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 8836840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The apparent fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement: effect of three variables.
    Lewis G; Nyman J; Trieu HH
    Biomaterials; 1998 May; 19(10):961-7. PubMed ID: 9690838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement.
    Topoleski LD; Ducheyne P; Cuckler JM
    Biomaterials; 1993 Dec; 14(15):1165-72. PubMed ID: 8130322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methyl methacrylate levels in orthopedic surgery: comparison of two conventional vacuum mixing systems.
    Jelecevic J; Maidanjuk S; Leithner A; Loewe K; Kuehn KD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 May; 58(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 24567286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temperature and its effect on bone cement.
    Eveleigh R
    Br J Perioper Nurs; 2001 Apr; 11(4):164-8. PubMed ID: 11892347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture and fracture toughness of the Simplex-P cement/bone interface.
    Menis DL; Gilbert JL; Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP
    Northwest Dent Res; 1991; 3(1):15. PubMed ID: 1840803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?
    Wang JS; Toksvig-Larsen S; Müller-Wille P; Franźen H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8736030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uniaxial tensile fatigue of two dental acrylics and Simplex-P bone cement.
    Menis DL; Gilbert JL; Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP
    Northwest Dent Res; 1991; 3(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 1840804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toxicity of methyl methacrylate monomer in orbital and cranial surgery.
    Wesley RE; Brinsko JD
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1992 Aug; 24(8):307-9. PubMed ID: 1416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.