These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11995018)

  • 1. Did nurse call Dr. twice: did Dr. have duty to check Pt.? Case on point: Stubbs v. Ray, 2000 WL 125325 S.E.2d - GA (2000).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Sep; 41(4):4. PubMed ID: 11995018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Georgia Supreme Court affirmed 'gross negligence' standard Case on point: Gliemmo v. Cousineau, SO9A1807 (3/15/2010) So.2d-GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):4. PubMed ID: 20499621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Were hospital's nurses or physicians' nurses liable?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 May; 47(12):1. PubMed ID: 17601093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nurse injured: alleges M.D. and Pt. intoxicated. Case in point: Bosch v. Perry (311 S.E. 2d 481-GA).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Apr; 24(11):2. PubMed ID: 6562668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GA: Dr. sues for 'med-mal' in federal court: failure to prove causation under applicable law. Eley v. Baptist Hospital Worth County Incorporated, No. 06-12621 (11th Cir. 09/12/2006) F.3d -GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Sep; 47(4):3. PubMed ID: 17063581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GA: failure to monitor infant-neurological injury: nurse not liable for deprivation of oxygen, etc.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Dec; 44(7):3. PubMed ID: 14730830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Did deplorable nursing result in pyoderma gangrenosum? Case on point: Knight v. West Paces Ferry Hospital, Inc., 2003 WL 21384585 S.E.2d-GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):4. PubMed ID: 14508922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgeon attempts to blame nurses for sponge left in mastectomy patient. Case on point: Mitchell v. Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr., 2003 WL 21508493 S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):2. PubMed ID: 14508919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.