These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11995071)

  • 1. $5 million jury verdict: fault apportioned 57% Dr. 43% RN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Dec; 41(7):1. PubMed ID: 11995071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delivering the verdict.
    Nursing; 2003 Dec; 33(12):28. PubMed ID: 14708540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate.
    Borg E
    Can Nurse; 2003 Sep; 99(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 14558316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The obstetrical dilemma.
    Avery JK
    J Ark Med Soc; 2005 Dec; 102(6):156-7. PubMed ID: 16381401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal strips "missing": did nurses monitor patient?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 May; 40(12):2. PubMed ID: 11995057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal briefs for nurses. PA: expert testimony on care standard--OK: testimony on causation & diagnosis--NG; MO: failure to recognize complications: admissibility of nursing staff meeting minutes.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Dec; 36(7):3. PubMed ID: 8685373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nursing liability risk--three perspectives.
    Lark K; Dean K; Mikos CA
    Fla Nurse; 2000 Mar; 48(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 11995164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speaking out on medical malpractice: nurse relays impact of lawsuits to profession.
    AWHONN Lifelines; 2005; 9(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 15926278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Litigation, electronic fetal monitoring, and the obstetric nurse.
    McRae MJ
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1993; 22(5):410-9. PubMed ID: 8246093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurses have limited responsibility to override physician. Daniels v. Durham County Hospital Corp., 615 S.E. 2d 60 (Ct. App. N.C. 2005).
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2005; 25(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 23631024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Medical-legal aspects: the obstetrician as a defendant or as an expert].
    Pierre F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Feb; 32(1 Suppl):1S114-8. PubMed ID: 12592175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Did Ob R.N. fail to timely report decelerations?
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):2. PubMed ID: 10223025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Medical malpractice decisions and guidelines for monitoring responsibility in the neonatal period].
    Uphoff R
    Kinderkrankenschwester; 2014 Jan; 33(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 24649581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 'Simian creases' prove 'prenatal' injury: no liability. Case on point: Day v. Zuschke, (01/03/2008) P.3d -AZ.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jul; 49(2):2. PubMed ID: 18727319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurses failed to respond to Ob/Gyn patient's pleas for help. Case on point: Nasser v. St. Vincent Hospital Health Svcs., 49A020919-CV-955, (4/14/2010)-IN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 May; 50(12):4. PubMed ID: 20557021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.