These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11995191)

  • 21. Nurses fail to respond: "loss of chance"--death. Case in point: Ard v. East Jefferson General Hospital 636 So. 2d 1042 LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Aug; 35(3):2. PubMed ID: 7938493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nurse orders labor patient transferred: death results.
    Tammelleo JD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Feb; 34(9):1. PubMed ID: 8171190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Legal case briefs for nurses. GA: slip & fall case against hospital: the nurse's role as a percipient witness; MO: malpractice suit against multiple parties: venue based on nurse's residence.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jul; 37(2):3. PubMed ID: 8850780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nurses' negligence explored by California court. Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 Sep; 22(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 16130833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Over $2 million dollar award for death from delivery error affirmed. Case on point: Hatwood v. Hospital of Univ of Penn., 2012 PA Super 217 (10/5/2012)-PA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Oct; 53(5):4. PubMed ID: 23156023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can a nurse be in two places at one time?: understaffing? Case in point: Merritt v. Karcioglu 668 So. 2d 469--LA (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Apr; 36(11):2. PubMed ID: 8711114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Failure to recall & chart pt.'s fall: 'falsus in uno' test. Case on point: Green v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc., 2002 WL 371808 NE.2d. -DE.
    Tammelleo AD
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Mar; 42(10):2. PubMed ID: 11980417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nurses fail to listen to patient's complaints. Case in point: Harmon v. Patel 617 N.E. 2d 183--IL (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Oct; 34(5):2. PubMed ID: 8248493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Legal case briefs for nurses. PA: medicated pre-op patient falls: incident report excluded from evidence. CA: patient complains of "strange feeling": failure to communicate--brain damage results.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Feb; 34(9):3. PubMed ID: 8171192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in vitals, etc. not reported: "window exit death". Case in point: Busta v. Columbus Hosp. Corp. 916P. 2d 122--MT (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jul; 37(2):2. PubMed ID: 8850779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nurse and the law. Relying on the count.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jun; 21(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 1530515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Why wasn't 'continuous treatment' doctrine applied? Case on point: Knox v. Greenville Hospital System, 2005 WL 20007 S.E.2d--SC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):2. PubMed ID: 15754900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Did nurses fail to 'give Procardia' as ordered? Case on point: Piro v. Chandler, 2000 WL 1634167 So.2d--LA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Nov; 41(6):4. PubMed ID: 11995006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When nurses must question doctors' orders.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Feb; 28(9):1. PubMed ID: 3347755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 02 disconnected, pt. misplaced, notes altered & missing. Case in point: Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 661 So. 2d 991--LA (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Dec; 36(7):4. PubMed ID: 8685374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.