165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11996916)
1. Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level.
Homminga J; McCreadie BR; Ciarelli TE; Weinans H; Goldstein SA; Huiskes R
Bone; 2002 May; 30(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 11996916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anisotropy of osteoporotic cancellous bone.
Sugita H; Oka M; Toguchida J; Nakamura T; Ueo T; Hayami T
Bone; 1999 May; 24(5):513-6. PubMed ID: 10321912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro-finite-element method to assess elastic properties of trabecular bone at micro- and macroscopic level.
Rieger R; Auregan JC; Hoc T
Morphologie; 2018 Mar; 102(336):12-20. PubMed ID: 28893491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of osteoporosis-related reduction in the mechanical properties of bone on the acetabular fracture during a sideways fall: A parametric finite element approach.
Khakpour S; Esrafilian A; Tanska P; Mononen ME; Korhonen RK; Jämsä T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263458. PubMed ID: 35130332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apparent- and Tissue-Level Yield Behaviors of L4 Vertebral Trabecular Bone and Their Associations with Microarchitectures.
Gong H; Wang L; Fan Y; Zhang M; Qin L
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Apr; 44(4):1204-23. PubMed ID: 26104807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Altered tissue properties induce changes in cancellous bone architecture in aging and diseases.
van der Linden JC; Day JS; Verhaar JA; Weinans H
J Biomech; 2004 Mar; 37(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 14757456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Difference in subchondral cancellous bone between postmenopausal women with hip osteoarthritis and osteoporotic fracture: implication for fatigue microdamage, bone microarchitecture, and biomechanical properties.
Li ZC; Dai LY; Jiang LS; Qiu S
Arthritis Rheum; 2012 Dec; 64(12):3955-62. PubMed ID: 23124609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regional differences in mechanical and material properties of femoral head cancellous bone in health and osteoarthritis.
Brown SJ; Pollintine P; Powell DE; Davie MW; Sharp CA
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 12170373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of Young׳s modulus of trabeculae in microscale using macro-scale׳s relationships between bone density and mechanical properties.
Cyganik Ł; Binkowski M; Kokot G; Rusin T; Popik P; Bolechała F; Nowak R; Wróbel Z; John A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Aug; 36():120-34. PubMed ID: 24837330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.
Bayraktar HH; Morgan EF; Niebur GL; Morris GE; Wong EK; Keaveny TM
J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 14672565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difference in femoral head and neck material properties between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis.
Sun SS; Ma HL; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK; Wei HW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008; 23 Suppl 1():S39-47. PubMed ID: 18187243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between CT intensity, micro-architecture and mechanical properties of porcine vertebral cancellous bone.
Teo JC; Si-Hoe KM; Keh JE; Teoh SH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 16356612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The fracture toughness of cancellous bone.
Cook RB; Zioupos P
J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2054-60. PubMed ID: 19643417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dependence of anisotropy of human lumbar vertebral trabecular bone on quantitative computed tomography-based apparent density.
Aiyangar AK; Vivanco J; Au AG; Anderson PA; Smith EL; Ploeg HL
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Sep; 136(9):091003. PubMed ID: 24825322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.
Szulc P; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Dargent-Molina P; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Feb; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15983728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24777672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of impact direction on the fracture load of osteoporotic proximal femurs.
Wakao N; Harada A; Matsui Y; Takemura M; Shimokata H; Mizuno M; Ito M; Matsuyama Y; Ishiguro N
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1134-9. PubMed ID: 19665419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of intrinsic damage properties to bone fragility: a finite element study.
Hardisty MR; Zauel R; Stover SM; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Jan; 135(1):011004. PubMed ID: 23363215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone mineral density and singh index predict bone mechanical properties of human femur.
D'Amelio P; Rossi P; Isaia G; Lollino N; Castoldi F; Girardo M; Dettoni F; Sattin F; Delise M; Bignardi C
Connect Tissue Res; 2008; 49(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 18382896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
