These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11997804)

  • 1. Sensitivity of photoscreening to detect high-magnitude amblyogenic factors.
    Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Ottar W; Scott WE
    J AAPOS; 2002 Apr; 6(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 11997804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update.
    Donahue SP; Arthur B; Neely DE; Arnold RW; Silbert D; Ruben JB;
    J AAPOS; 2013 Feb; 17(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 23360915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for amblyogenic factors using a volunteer lay network and the MTI photoscreener. Initial results from 15,000 preschool children in a statewide effort.
    Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Leonard-Martin TC
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1637-44; discussion 1645-6. PubMed ID: 10964820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors by public health personnel: the Eyecor Camera System.
    Enzenauer RW; Freeman HL; Larson MR; Williams TL
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 7(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10652167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-based refinement of referral criteria for photoscreening.
    Donahue SP; Johnson TM
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Dec; 108(12):2309-14; discussion 2314-5. PubMed ID: 11733276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study.
    Moghaddam AA; Kargozar A; Zarei-Ghanavati M; Najjaran M; Nozari V; Shakeri MT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 96(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 21515564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs. III. improved grading criteria for hyperopia.
    Tong PY; Macke JP; Bassin RE; Everett M; Enke-Miyazaki E; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Parks MM; Beauchamp GR
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 10964819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Amblyogenic Refractive Error Using the Spot Vision Screener in Children.
    Gaiser H; Moore B; Srinivasan G; Solaka N; He R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):324-331. PubMed ID: 32413003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-cycloplegic screening for refractive errors in children with the hand-held autorefractor Retinomax: final results and comparison with non-cycloplegic photoscreening.
    Cordonnier M; Kallay O
    Strabismus; 2001 Jun; 9(2):59-70. PubMed ID: 11458294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the iScreen and the MTI photoscreeners for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children.
    Silbert DI; Arnold RW; Matta NS
    J AAPOS; 2013 Feb; 17(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 23415034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Associations between hyperopia and other vision and refractive error characteristics.
    Kulp MT; Ying GS; Huang J; Maguire M; Quinn G; Ciner EB; Cyert LA; Orel-Bixler DA; Moore BD;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 91(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 24637486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population.
    Enzenauer RW
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology.
    Freedman HL; Preston KL
    Ophthalmology; 1992 Dec; 99(12):1785-95. PubMed ID: 1480393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of the MTI photoscreener for amblyogenic factors in infancy and early childhood.
    Weinand F; Gräf M; Demming K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 236(11):801-5. PubMed ID: 9825254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors.
    Ottar WL; Scott WE; Holgado SI
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1995; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 8531032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of the Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners for detection of astigmatism.
    Crescioni M; Miller JM; Harvey EM
    J AAPOS; 2015 Oct; 19(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 26486025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The performance of visual photoscreening for Chinese preschool children aged 4 to 5 years].
    Li R; Huang D; Zhu H; Sun QG; Wang Y; Zhang XH; Zhao XY; He J; Liu L; Zhou JJ; Liu H
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 56(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32187947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: II. Sensitivity and specificity of the MTI photoscreener.
    Tong PY; Bassin RE; Enke-Miyazaki E; Macke JP; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Beauchamp GR; Parks MM
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1623-9. PubMed ID: 10964818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of developmentally-at-risk status on the reliability of the iScreen® photorefractive device in young children.
    Kerr NC; Somes G; Enzenauer RW
    Am Orthopt J; 2011; 61():117-23. PubMed ID: 21856879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field testing of the plusoptiX S04 photoscreener.
    Arthur BW; Riyaz R; Rodriguez S; Wong J
    J AAPOS; 2009 Feb; 13(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 19121596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.