These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11999862)

  • 21. The psychological refractory period of stopping.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):965-81. PubMed ID: 14585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?
    Van Selst M; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1268-83. PubMed ID: 10531663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The psychological refractory period in Parkinson's disease.
    Hsieh S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):893-902. PubMed ID: 11153866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 26377338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions.
    Le Bars S; Hsu YF; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():6-15. PubMed ID: 27467892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: evidence from manipulating response-code overlap.
    Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2009 May; 73(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 18443819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of endogenous and exogenous orientations of attention on inhibition of return in a cross-modal target-target aiming task.
    Lyons J; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Dhillon VP; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2006 May; 38(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16709561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period.
    Marti S; Sigman M; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2883-98. PubMed ID: 21988891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A PRP-study to determine the locus of target priming effects.
    Klapötke S; Krüger D; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):882-900. PubMed ID: 21570320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ideomotor-compatible tasks partially escape dual-task interference in both young and elderly adults.
    Hartley AA; Seaman B; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Mar; 30(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25689613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.
    Stelzel C; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):476-90. PubMed ID: 21811837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.
    Lien MC; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):212-38. PubMed ID: 12120784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blinded by headlights.
    Stevanovski B; Oriet C; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Jun; 56(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 12066422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
    Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing.
    Badets A; Koch I; Toussaint L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 22935328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.