159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12000325)
1. Oak moss extracts in the diagnosis of fragrance contact allergy.
Johansen JD; Heydorn S; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Mar; 46(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12000325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contaminating resin acids have not caused the high rate of sensitivity to oak moss.
Buckley DA; Rycroft RJ; White IR; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 12225408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact allergy to oak moss: search for sensitizing molecules using combined bioassay-guided chemical fractionation, GC-MS, and structure-activity relationship analysis.
Bernard G; Giménez-Arnau E; Rastogi SC; Heydorn S; Johansen JD; Menné T; Goossens A; Andersen K; Lepoittevin JP
Arch Dermatol Res; 2003 Nov; 295(6):229-35. PubMed ID: 13680271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fragrant and sticky allergens from the pinewood: Cohabiting and coreacting.
Paulsen E; Andersen F
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Nov; 81(5):374-377. PubMed ID: 31281968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced content of chloroatranol and atranol in oak moss absolute significantly reduces the elicitation potential of this fragrance material.
Andersen F; Andersen KH; Bernois A; Brault C; Bruze M; Eudes H; Gadras C; Signoret AC; Mose KF; Müller BP; Toulemonde B; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Feb; 72(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 25395354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contact sensitization to tree moss (Evernia furfuracea extract, INCI) is heterogeneous.
Uter W; Schmidt E; Lessmann H; Schnuch A
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jul; 67(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22486592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Allergy to lichen acids in a fragrance.
Rademaker M
Australas J Dermatol; 2000 Feb; 41(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 10715903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of batch and patch test method in establishing contact allergy to fragrance mix I-EDEN Fragrance Study Group.
Bruze M; Mowitz M; Ofenloch R; Coenraads PJ; Diepgen TL; Elsner P; Gonçalo M; Naldi L; Svensson Å
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Aug; 81(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 30810228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colophonium and Compositae mix as markers of fragrance allergy: cross-reactivity between fragrance terpenes, colophonium and compositae plant extracts.
Paulsen E; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 16283907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch testing with serial dilutions and thin-layer chromatograms of oak moss absolutes containing high and low levels of atranol and chloroatranol.
Mowitz M; Zimerson E; Svedman C; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Dec; 69(6):342-9. PubMed ID: 24102141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy to atranorin in lichens and perfumes.
Dahlquist I; Fregert S
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7398261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens.
Katsarma G; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 10515097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic workup of fragrance allergy].
Geier J; Uter W
Hautarzt; 2015 Sep; 66(9):674-9. PubMed ID: 26253114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of new fragrance mixtures.
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Fischer T; Elsner P; Frosch P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott M; Nethercottdagger J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9810019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK*.
Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Geier J; Frosch PJ; Uter W;
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Feb; 50(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 15128316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicentre study of fragrance allergy in Hungary. Immediate and late type reactions.
Temesvári E; Németh I; Baló-Banga MJ; Husz S; Kohánka V; Somos Z; Judák R; Remenyik EV; Szegedi A; Nebenführer L; Mészáros C; Horváth A
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jun; 46(6):325-30. PubMed ID: 12190620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
