BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12001136)

  • 1. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
    Levin CE; Sellors JW
    Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2312-4; author reply 2314-6. PubMed ID: 12001136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
    Suba EJ; Nguyen CH; Nguyen BD; Raab SS;
    Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):928-39. PubMed ID: 11251944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cost effectiveness of human papilloma virus testing in cervical cancer screening: a literature review].
    Mejía A; Salas W
    Biomedica; 2008 Mar; 28(1):160-72. PubMed ID: 18645671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
    Reust CE
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in developing countries.
    Suba EJ; Frable WJ; Raab SS
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(14):1535-6; author reply 1535-6. PubMed ID: 16598056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Costs and problems in cervix cancer screening are considerably underestimated].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3506-8. PubMed ID: 11037597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the sensitivity of cervical cytology: what are the issues?
    Myers ER
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):838-40. PubMed ID: 11067380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cervix cancer screening can be cost-effective. Combination of vaginal smears and the HPV test should be even more beneficial].
    Bistoletti P; Ellström A; Dillner J; Sennfält K; Sparén P; Strander B
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Jun 13-26; 102(24-25):1874-6, 1878-9. PubMed ID: 16044766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
    Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
    Perovic S
    J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost of screening for cancerous and precancerous lesions of the cervix.
    Méréa E; Le Galès C; Cochand-Priollet B; Cartier I; de Crémoux P; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Vielh P; Coste J
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Oct; 27(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 12357505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical screening program for Sri Lanka--can we afford it?
    Sirisena J
    Ceylon Med J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10643099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re: Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.
    Blamey S; Jackson T; Robinson J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):70-1; author reply 71-2. PubMed ID: 16441706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ["Cost-effectiveness" of cervical screening].
    Kostova P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 17974169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scan-and-treat methodology using Azure A fast stain as a cost-effective cervical cancer screening alternative to visual inspection with acetic acid.
    Guillaud M; Benedet JL; Follen M; Crain BT; MacAulay C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S256-9. PubMed ID: 17825881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A reply on cervix cancer screening: cervical cytological test doesn't fulfil the requirements of a good screening test].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(37):4042. PubMed ID: 11036367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
    Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is a once-in-a-lifetime pap smear the best option for low-resourced settings?
    Robles SC
    Int J Cancer; 2004 Aug; 111(1):160-1; discussion 162. PubMed ID: 15185358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cost-benefit analysis of the Program for Early Screening of Cervico-uterine Cancer].
    Hernández-Peña P; Lazcano-Ponce EC; Alonso-de Ruiz P; Cruz-Valdez A; Meneses-González F; Hernández-Avila M
    Salud Publica Mex; 1997; 39(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 9381251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.