128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12002599)
1. Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI.
Nakahara H; Namba K; Wakamatsu H; Watanabe R; Furusawa H; Shirouzu M; Matsu T; Tanaka C; Akiyama F; Ifuku H; Nakahara M; Tamura S
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12002599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma.
Schouten van der Velden AP; Boetes C; Bult P; Wobbes T
Am J Surg; 2006 Aug; 192(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16860625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging.
Facius M; Renz DM; Neubauer H; Böttcher J; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 17996602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional helical CT for treatment planning of breast cancer.
Hiramatsu H; Enomoto K; Ikeda T; Mukai M; Furuta T; Hattori H; Tanami Y; Ohashi T; Kitajima M; Hiramatsu K
Radiat Med; 1999; 17(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10378650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The use of high resolution MR imaging for pre-treatment evaluation of breast cancer: detection of intraductal spread].
Hiramatsu H; Ikeda T; Enomoto K; Mukai M; Kikuchi K; Furukawa J; Oshio K; Kitajima M; Hiramatsu K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Mar; 57(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 9125874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of breast cancer: MDCT versus MRI.
Tozaki M
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 18443898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ductal pattern enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast due to ductal lavage.
Ghanouni P; Kurian AW; Margolis D; Hartman AR; Mills MA; Plevritis SK; Ford JM; Daniel BL
Breast J; 2007; 13(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17461903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [MRI of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: patterns of findings and evaluation of disease extent].
Hiramatsu H; Ikeda T; Mukai M; Masamura S; Kikuchi K; Hiramatsu K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Mar; 60(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 10774182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of MDCT and MRI for evaluating the intraductal component of breast cancer.
Shimauchi A; Yamada T; Sato A; Takase K; Usami S; Ishida T; Moriya T; Takahashi S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 16861533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of FDG PET and MRI for evaluating the tumor extent of breast cancer and the impact of FDG PET on the systemic staging and prognosis of patients who are candidates for breast-conserving therapy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18663562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
Schelfout K; Van Goethem M; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Schelfhout AM; Leyman P; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Den Haute J; Gillardin JP; Tjalma W; Van Der Auwera JC; Buytaert P; De Schepper A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T].
Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging.
Hollingsworth AB; Stough RG; O'Dell CA; Brekke CE
Am J Surg; 2008 Sep; 196(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18436185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Application of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI and post-processing technique for diagnosis of breast cancer].
Peng KQ; Huang ZL; Xie CM; Chen L; Ouyang Y; Zheng QS; Zhang Y; He HQ; Wu PH
Ai Zheng; 2009 May; 28(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 19624888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
