BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12002868)

  • 1. Glottal flow through a two-mass model: comparison of Navier-Stokes solutions with simplified models.
    de Vries MP; Schutte HK; Veldman AE; Verkerke GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1847-53. PubMed ID: 12002868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental analysis of the pressures and flows within a driven mechanical model of phonation.
    Kucinschi BR; Scherer RC; Dewitt KJ; Ng TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3011-21. PubMed ID: 16708957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetric airflow and vibration induced by the Coanda effect in a symmetric model of the vocal folds.
    Tao C; Zhang Y; Hottinger DG; Jiang JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2270-8. PubMed ID: 17902863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of air flow and medial adductory compression on vocal efficiency and glottal vibration.
    Berke GS; Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Trapp TK; Macagba C; Natividad M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Mar; 102(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 2108407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indirect assessment of the contribution of subglottal air pressure and vocal-fold tension to changes of fundamental frequency in English.
    Monsen RB; Engebretson AM; Vemula NR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jul; 64(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 712003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computational study of the effect of vocal-fold asymmetry on phonation.
    Xue Q; Mittal R; Zheng X; Bielamowicz S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):818-27. PubMed ID: 20707451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulation of glottal closure and airflow in a three-dimensional phonation model: implications for vocal intensity control.
    Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):898-910. PubMed ID: 25698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the application of the lattice Boltzmann method to the investigation of glottal flow.
    Kucinschi BR; Afjeh AA; Scherer RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):523-34. PubMed ID: 18646995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulation of vocal fold impact pressures with a self-oscillating finite-element model.
    Tao C; Jiang JJ; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3987-94. PubMed ID: 16838541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A computational study of the effect of false vocal folds on glottal flow and vocal fold vibration during phonation.
    Zheng X; Bielamowicz S; Luo H; Mittal R
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 37(3):625-42. PubMed ID: 19142730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal glottal configuration for ease of phonation.
    Lucero JC
    J Voice; 1998 Jun; 12(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 9649070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional reduced-order continuum model of phonation.
    Farahani MH; Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):EL172. PubMed ID: 27586776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flow visualization and pressure distributions in a model of the glottis with a symmetric and oblique divergent angle of 10 degrees.
    Shinwari D; Scherer RC; DeWitt KJ; Afjeh AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):487-97. PubMed ID: 12558286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimized transformation of the glottal motion into a mechanical model.
    Triep M; Brücker C; Stingl M; Döllinger M
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 21115384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flow separation in a computational oscillating vocal fold model.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1710-9. PubMed ID: 15478438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further studies of phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa.
    Chan RW; Titze IR; Titze MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3722-7. PubMed ID: 9193059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of impact stress using an aeroelastic model of voice production.
    Horácek J; Laukkanen AM; Sidlof P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2007; 32(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 17990190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental validation of quasi-one-dimensional and two-dimensional steady glottal flow models.
    Cisonni J; Van Hirtum A; Luo XY; Pelorson X
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Sep; 48(9):903-10. PubMed ID: 20556662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2926-35. PubMed ID: 1629485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms.
    Vilkman E; Lauri ER; Alku P; Sala E; Sihvo M
    J Voice; 1999 Jun; 13(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 10442763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.