BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12004660)

  • 1. Screening for oral cancer and precancer--a valuable new technique.
    Drinnan AJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):656-60. PubMed ID: 12004660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The oral brush biopsy: a new reason to screen every patient for oral cancer.
    Eisen D
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 11199564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy.
    Svirsky JA; Burns JC; Page DG; Abbey LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):99-102, 104, 106; quiz 108. PubMed ID: 11911069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients.
    Mehrotra R; Singh MK; Pandya S; Singh M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18644521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Premalignant oral mucosal diseases.
    Melrose RJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 29(8):593-600. PubMed ID: 11577670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Leukoplakia and erythroplakia--two orale precursor lesions].
    Grajewski S; Groneberg D
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 Oct; 88(10):666-72; quiz 673-5. PubMed ID: 19813163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy status for detection of malignant and premalignant oral lesions: quantitative cytologic assessment and review of methods for cytomorphometric measurements.
    Pektas ZO; Keskin A; Günhan O; Karslioğlu Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):628-35. PubMed ID: 16546642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro examination of suspicious oral lesions using optical coherence tomography.
    Jerjes W; Upile T; Conn B; Hamdoon Z; Betz CS; McKenzie G; Radhi H; Vourvachis M; El Maaytah M; Sandison A; Jay A; Hopper C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 48(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 19726114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis of two computer-assisted screening methods for diagnosing oral precancer and cancer.
    Ye X; Zhang J; Tan Y; Chen G; Zhou G
    Oral Oncol; 2015 Nov; 51(11):966-975. PubMed ID: 26384539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group.
    Sciubba JJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1445-57. PubMed ID: 10570588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of computer-assisted brush biopsy results with follow up scalpel biopsy and histology.
    Svirsky JA; Burns JC; Carpenter WM; Cohen DM; Bhattacharyya I; Fantasia JE; Lederman DA; Lynch DP; Sciubba JJ; Zunt SL
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 12572180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Precancerous lesions of the buccal mucosa].
    Ben Slama L
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2001 Apr; 102(2):77-108. PubMed ID: 11446145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The precancerous condition of the mouth mucosa. Advantage of early diagnosis].
    Sentilhes C; Mercure JL
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1982; 11(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 6957961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Various considerations on early cancer of the oral mucosa and its diagnostic techniques].
    Lobos N
    Odontol Chil; 1982; 30(128):138-42. PubMed ID: 6965019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Screening and diagnosis of precancerous oral mucosa lesions].
    Reychler H; Weynand B
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2010 Sep; 111(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 20797741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [In vivo diagnosis of epithelial changes of the oropharynx using confocal microscopy].
    Just T; Stave J; Bombor I; Kreutzer HJ; Guthoff R; Pau HW
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2008 Mar; 87(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 17963192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sensitivity and specificity of the OralCDx technique: evaluation of 103 cases.
    Scheifele C; Schmidt-Westhausen AM; Dietrich T; Reichart PA
    Oral Oncol; 2004 Sep; 40(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 15288838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of oral premalignant and malignant lesions using cytomorphometry.
    Ramaesh T; Mendis BR; Ratnatunga N; Thattil RO
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1999 Mar; 22(85):23-8. PubMed ID: 11372099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting oral cancer: a new technique and case reports.
    Kois JC; Truelove E
    Dent Today; 2006 Oct; 25(10):94, 96-7. PubMed ID: 17058395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy in detecting dysplastic oral lesions.
    Bhoopathi V; Kabani S; Mascarenhas AK
    Cancer; 2009 Mar; 115(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19165806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.