88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12004666)
1. Restoration and reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with a polyethylene ribbon and prefabricated fiberglass post.
Kimmel SS
Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 12004666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation and restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth.
Johnson JK; Schwartz NL; Blackwell RT
J Am Dent Assoc; 1976 Sep; 93(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 783231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Figueiredo FE; Martins-Filho PR; Faria-E-Silva AL
J Endod; 2015 Mar; 41(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25459568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fracture resistance in root canal-treated teeth restored using different techniques.
Aslan T; Sagsen B; Er Ö; Ustun Y; Cinar F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 21(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 29888730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review.
Goracci C; Ferrari M
Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56 Suppl 1():77-83. PubMed ID: 21564118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced custom posts and cores: a 97-month study.
Piovesan EM; Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 18069374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration.
Cheung W
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 May; 136(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 15966648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress-reduced Direct Composites for the Restoration of Structurally Compromised Teeth: Fiber Design According to the "Wallpapering" Technique.
Deliperi S; Alleman D; Rudo D
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):233-243. PubMed ID: 28467261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polyethylene fiber-reinforced composite resin used as a short post in severely decayed primary anterior teeth: a case report.
Bayrak S; Tunc ES; Tuloglu N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):e60-4. PubMed ID: 19272811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress Distribution and Fracture Resistance of repairing Cracked Tooth with Fiber-reinforced Composites and Onlay.
Shi R; Meng X; Feng R; Hong S; Hu C; Yang M; Jiang Y
Aust Endod J; 2022 Dec; 48(3):458-464. PubMed ID: 34708907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a bondable reinforcement fiber for post-and-core buildup in an endodontically treated tooth: a case report.
Eskitaşcioğlu G; Belli S
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):549-51. PubMed ID: 12165992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations.
Ayna B; Ayna E; Çelenk S; Başaran EG; Yılmaz BD; Tacir İH; Tuncer MC
World J Clin Cases; 2018 Mar; 6(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 29564355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture Resistance of Tilted Premolars Restored with Different Post-Core Systems.
Abdelaziz KM; Khalil AA; Alsalhi IY; Almufarrij AJ; Mojathel AY
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017; 7(6):344-350. PubMed ID: 29387618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D FEA of cemented glass fiber and cast posts with various dental cements in a maxillary central incisor.
Madfa AA; Al-Hamzi MA; Al-Sanabani FA; Al-Qudaimi NH; Yue XG
Springerplus; 2015; 4():598. PubMed ID: 26543733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retentive strength of different intracanal posts in restorations of anterior primary teeth: an in vitro study.
Memarpour M; Shafiei F; Abbaszadeh M
Restor Dent Endod; 2013 Nov; 38(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 24303356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different restorative techniques on the strength of endodontically treated weakened roots.
Alsamadani KH; Abdaziz el-SM; Gad el-S
Int J Dent; 2012; 2012():343712. PubMed ID: 22666251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ex vivo comparative study on the retention of custom and prefabricated posts.
Singh A; Logani A; Shah N
J Conserv Dent; 2012 Apr; 15(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 22557821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-year follow up of customized glass fiber esthetic posts.
da Costa RG; de Morais EC; Leão MP; Bindo MJ; Campos EA; Correr GM
Eur J Dent; 2011 Jan; 5(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 21228960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
