BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12004668)

  • 21. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
    Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
    Ozel E; Soyman M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems.
    Estafan AM; Estafan D
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Sep; 21(9):705-8, 710, 712; quiz 714. PubMed ID: 11199644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box.
    Jain P; Belcher M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):235-8. PubMed ID: 11764108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of accelerated restorative techniques on the microleakage of Class II composites.
    Uctasli S; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 12469751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of tetric ceram/excite and Ariston pHc/Ariston liner.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 11803996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
    Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sealing ability of packable resin composites in class II restorations.
    Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 14621243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
    Wibowo G; Stockton L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different surface pre-treatment methods on the microleakage of two different self-adhesive composites in Class V cavities.
    Celik EU; Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25793951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.