These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1200477)

  • 1. The peer review system on trial.
    Bowers R
    Am Sci; 1975; 63(6):624-6. PubMed ID: 1200477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research funding and the peer review system.
    Apirion D
    Fed Proc; 1979 Dec; 38(13):2649-50. PubMed ID: 510555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
    Bucy PC
    Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remembering the peer in peer review.
    O'Connell KA
    Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF.
    Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The peer review system.
    Homburger F
    Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349-50. PubMed ID: 7371871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The peer review system.
    Paque RE
    Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2350-1. PubMed ID: 7371872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The peer review system.
    Rutman JF
    Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349. PubMed ID: 7371870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moron peer review.
    Brenner S
    Curr Biol; 1999 Oct; 9(20):R755. PubMed ID: 10531042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review: the attacks from without.
    Brandt EN
    Clin Res; 1986 Oct; 34(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 3780137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter: Peer review.
    Westhead EW
    Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1679. PubMed ID: 4827513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The "peer review" system needs to be changed.
    Hill GJ
    J Cancer Educ; 1989; 4(3):191-2. PubMed ID: 2641339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does peer review work?
    Symington JW; Kramer TR
    Am Sci; 1977; 65(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 842929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial: Peer review under fire.
    Feldmann EG
    J Pharm Sci; 1973 Dec; 62(12):1. PubMed ID: 4762173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creativity and peer review.
    Fusaro RM
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Dec; 17(12):1146. PubMed ID: 10585676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
    Bondurant S
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: a crisis in confidence.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1986 Oct; 34(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 3780138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.