These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12005118)

  • 1. Studies of cutaneous blood flow of normal forearm skin and irritated forearm skin based on high-resolution laser Doppler perfusion imaging (HR-LDPI).
    Fullerton A; Rode B; Serup J
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12005118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin irritation typing and grading based on laser Doppler perfusion imaging.
    Fullerton A; Rode B; Serup J
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 12005117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?
    Aramaki J; Effendy I; Happle R; Kawana S; Löffler C; Löffler H
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Nov; 45(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11722488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of body mass index on skin susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Löffler H; Aramaki JU; Effendy I
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12005116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring of skin response to sodium lauryl sulphate: clinical scores versus bioengineering methods.
    van Neste D; de Brouwer B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Sep; 27(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 1451459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between 2 test models in evaluating the effect of a moisturizer on irritated human skin.
    Held E; Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 May; 40(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 10344481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct comparison of laser Doppler flowmetry and laser Doppler imaging for assessment of experimentally-induced inflammation in human skin.
    Petersen LJ
    Inflamm Res; 2013 Dec; 62(12):1073-8. PubMed ID: 24114290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to thermal stimuli in skin pretreated with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Aramaki J; Effendy I
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2001; 81(6):395-7. PubMed ID: 11859939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler for assessing microvascular function.
    Tew GA; Klonizakis M; Crank H; Briers JD; Hodges GJ
    Microvasc Res; 2011 Nov; 82(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 21803051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acute irritant reactivity to sodium lauryl sulfate in atopics and non-atopics.
    Basketter DA; Miettinen J; Lahti A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 May; 38(5):253-7. PubMed ID: 9667441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of laser Doppler perfusion images of experimental irritant skin reactions.
    Wårdell K; Andersson T; Anderson C
    Skin Res Technol; 1996 Nov; 2(4):149-57. PubMed ID: 27327545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of patch-test application tape on reactions to sodium dodecyl sulfate.
    Fischer T; Dahlén A; Bjarnason B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jan; 40(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 9928802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of skin irritancy in man by laser Doppler flowmetry.
    Nilsson GE; Otto U; Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Nov; 8(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 6217022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler perfusion imaging for tissue perfusion measurement.
    Guven G; Dijkstra A; Kuijper TM; Trommel N; van Baar ME; Topeli A; Ince C; van der Vlies CH
    Microcirculation; 2023 Jan; 30(1):e12795. PubMed ID: 36524297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The tandem repeated irritation test: a new method to assess prevention of irritant combination damage to the skin.
    Wigger-Alberti W; Spoo J; Schliemann-Willers S; Klotz A; Elsner P
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2002; 82(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 12125960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging of the radial forearm flap: a clinical study.
    Zdolsek JM; Droog EJ; Thorfinn J; Lidman D
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2006; 40(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 16537257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.